Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Vince <firelaw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:17:10 -0400
deemsbill@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 30, 8:04 am, Vince <fire...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Warspite wrote:Vince ha scritto:Germany's strategic position at sea was hopeless. The UK sits like aBritain controlled the North sea in the same way the GermansWitch you think was more important for the German economy, North sea o
controlled the baltic
Baltic Sea?
cork in the bottle.
Not if the HSF could take out the RN.
Vince
nonsense the HSF are coal burners. They don't have the range or staying power to project maritime power west of the UK Which is what would be needed. Its about 900 sea miles to the western approaches, 50 hours steaming at full speed
And what do they do when they get there?
to "take out" the Grand fleet they need to be bigger then he grand fleet. If they invest that much in the fleet the french army tears them apart.
Maritime war is not about battles. Its about seaborne commerce. In an era of coal fired ships and no aircraft Germany cannot disrupt British seaborne commerce from bases in Germany.
Vince
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Weatherlawyer
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: deemsbill
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Richard Casady
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- References:
- Dogfight Bismark
- From: Rich Johnson
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Warspite
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Vince
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Andrew Swallow
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Vince
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Warspite
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: Vince
- Re: Dogfight Bismark
- From: deemsbill
- Dogfight Bismark
- Prev by Date: Re: WW2 Island Hopping
- Next by Date: Re: Venezuela to buy Russian submarines
- Previous by thread: Re: Dogfight Bismark
- Next by thread: Re: Dogfight Bismark
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|