Re: A Tank Rule Occured

On Mar 31, 3:45 pm, "Arved Sandstrom" <asandst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Eugene Griessel" <eugene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:460ea7c6.40545305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[ SNIP ]> If my vocab module need a tweak - what in hell do you suppose
Eagleson's needs?

[ SNIP ]

I actually understood your response better than what he originally wrote. If
I were to write something like what he did, it might be something like this:

*****

At times bombers were fighters, and fighters were bombers. Then there were
bombers. And fighters. And some more fighters. And bombers bombed.

But later, after this event just described, the German leadership responded
to the catastrophe. They produced new U-boats. These submarines helped with
the bombers and fighters.

The industrial production under Speer was good. That's why we felt good
about Italy and Normandy and the Rhine and the Neisse and the Oder and
Berlin...we could defend them. Our airforce was strong, and we were winning,
until the Americans betrayed us.

Our militia units in North America still believe in our destiny - we can win
back the Fatherland. But we need the most modern tanks - MkIIIs and MkIVs
with 75mm stubbies. With those Vergeltungswaffen we will crush the Slavs.

When will the US Marine Corps stop planning to invade the Crimea? We do not
have enough LCUs. And there are only 6 battleships left.

*****

Between you and me, Eugene, Eagleson's post was the most disjointed post I
have seen in months. And yet is was generally grammatical, and spelled
correctly. I was in awe of it, and have since forwarded his resume to the
White House and several Madison Avenue agencies.

AHs

The hell with that, Haliburton lacks a President with real leadership
qualities since the last guy took that federal job. This is a man who
can say what you mean in a manner that you can deny or accept without
understanding.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Tank Rule Occured
    ... I actually understood your response better than what he originally wrote. ... At times bombers were fighters, ... Between you and me, Eugene, Eagleson's post was the most disjointed post ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: A Tank Rule Occured
    ... I actually understood your response better than what he originally wrote. ... At times bombers were fighters, ... Between you and me, Eugene, Eagleson's post was the most disjointed post I ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: A Tank Rule Occured
    ... I actually understood your response better than what he originally wrote. ... At times bombers were fighters, ... Between you and me, Eugene, Eagleson's post was the most disjointed post I ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: A Tank Rule Occured
    ... I actually understood your response better than what he originally wrote. ... At times bombers were fighters, ... Lots of rum. ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: J-UCAS cancelled in favor of new Bomber-Good!
    ... it can be done but operating costs are the killers. ... Fuel is far easier to transport to Diego than to ... > If you base your fighters at Bagram you're limited on what you can put ... > The bombers can make it from Diego to Afghanistan on one tank of gas. ...
    (rec.aviation.military)