Re: EUROPE - THY NAME IS COWARDICE (Interesting opinion from Europe)

Grey Satterfield wrote:
On 8/18/06 3:47 PM, in article SsKdnZPjz4nDunvZnZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx,
"Vince" <firelaw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Grey Satterfield wrote:
On 8/18/06 10:01 AM, in article Xns98236FE84E49Bjyanikkuanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The nonsense about holding theft victims responsible for what criminals do
with the victims firearm is just an attempt to make it too risky for
ordinary decent citizens to own firearms. Nothing more.
Yes, it's clear that Vince, Peter, and other's hostile to the idea of
private ownership of firearms want to make gun owners insurers, responsible
for whatever harm their guns may cause. Better yet, they would probably
like for gun manufacturers to be the insurers. If they disagree with this
notion they can certainly say so, it seems to me.

Grey Satterfield

I am perfectly happy to internalize the cost of gun injuries to the
price of the product.

I rest my case.

Grey Satterfield


True capitalism requires internalization of costs. Crony capitalism does not. In Crony capitalism those with political power externalize costs to those without political power

Vince
.

Relevant Pages