Re: NGFS: by submarine?
- From: "g lof2" <glof_eng@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jun 2006 14:27:03 -0700
Andre Lieven wrote:
"Kirk" (loneshoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) writes:Andre, would please stop attacking the new members. As we all be
Considering how dangerous it is for ships to get near enough to shore to
use their 5" guns for bombardment, why not mount one on a sub?
How about, because that would destroy the sub's ability to do its
regular job ?
Really, naval newbies really ought to READ some books on naval
matters before posting inane ***...
recently reminded, now of us will live forever, and we need new members
to keep the group alive. Remember that you were also a newbie at one
time, would you like to had your ideas just trashed with any
consideration.
If you must react, please use a positive tone, explain what is wrong
with the suggestion, and don't use catagorical rejections.
G Lof
Engineer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NGFS: by submarine?
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: NGFS: by submarine?
- References:
- NGFS: by submarine?
- From: Kirk
- Re: NGFS: by submarine?
- From: Andre Lieven
- NGFS: by submarine?
- Prev by Date: Re: When Does Opposition Journalism become Treason?
- Next by Date: Re: When did the RN's tenure as world's most powerful navy end?
- Previous by thread: Re: NGFS: by submarine?
- Next by thread: Re: NGFS: by submarine?
- Index(es):