Re: What NOT to name a ship
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 May 2006 13:19:09 GMT
Mark R. <null@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:9aqv62df2gdhkgpi0ht6o6j41h2vdm47s2@xxxxxxx:
There have been a few posts here in the past about what names should
be given to new ships. How about old ship names that we won't or
shouldn't see again? How about names that a ship simply shouldn't be
given?
Here's a few that come to mind. It will probably be a long while
before we see Japanese warships named Kaga, Akagi, or Soryu. Same for
a German ship named Bismarck. I have some doubt that we will ever see
a USS Bill Clinton in our lifetimes. But you never know. Jimmy
Carter and Ronald Reagan both had ships named for them.
Mark
Reagan deserved it,Clinton didn't.
There's no Soviet Union because of Reagan's actions.
Clinton would have AIDED the USSR.
Any ship named after Jimmy Carter should be renamed.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What NOT to name a ship
- From: Leadfoot
- Re: What NOT to name a ship
- From: ray o'hara
- Re: What NOT to name a ship
- References:
- What NOT to name a ship
- From: Mark R .
- What NOT to name a ship
- Prev by Date: Re: What NOT to name a ship
- Next by Date: Re: What NOT to name a ship
- Previous by thread: Re: What NOT to name a ship
- Next by thread: Re: What NOT to name a ship
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|