Re: Naval Gunfire Question
- From: "B F Lake" <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:21:30 GMT
"TOliver" <toliverjrFIX@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lLFVf.14551$uX5.3204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
LONG BEACH was fitted with a pair of 5"/38 ("open mounts". IIRC, from thelong
deck edge sponsons of an ESSEX class CV losing 4 of her 8 in overhaul)
before the time inquestion.....(the threat of small attack craft already
becomoing a factor in the Summer of 1962 in the Med, and LB wasa LANTFLT
unit at the time).
Janes says she got the two 5" dual purpose guns in 1962-3 for defence
against low flying sub-sonic aircraft and torpedo boats. She was only a
year old then, so I am guessing it came out during trials that her missiles
were no good against low and slow fliers. (Time to re-hash the urban myth
about BISMARCK's fancy FC vs Stringbags <G>)
Regards,
Barry
.
- References:
- Naval Gunfire Question
- From: a425couple
- Re: Naval Gunfire Question
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Naval Gunfire Question
- From: TOliver
- Naval Gunfire Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Museum Ships "sleep on a battleship"
- Next by Date: Re: Museum Ships "sleep on a battleship"
- Previous by thread: Re: Naval Gunfire Question
- Next by thread: Re: Naval Gunfire Question
- Index(es):