Re: QDR Released




Kevin Brooks wrote:
And for the benefit of all of those who have said
that a conventioanlly armed Trident is such a loony idea that nobody in a
responsible position would support such idiocy, it does indeed call for the
USN to rapidly field a conventionally armed Trident, with a desired IOC only
two years out.


You missed something. The conventionally armed Trident Sub carries
cruise missiles. This is a known and accepted fact. No one has argued
this. The arguments you refer to are in regards to a conventionally
armed Trident _MISSILE_.
These are two very different things.

BB

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: QDR Released
    ... responsible position would support such idiocy, it does indeed call for the ... USN to rapidly field a conventionally armed Trident, ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: QDR Released
    ... responsible position would support such idiocy, ... USN to rapidly field a conventionally armed Trident, ... Geeze, pal, I was one of the guys arguing that a conventionally armed SLBM ... legion of "you are nuts" folks included that fellow who used to include some ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: QDR Released
    ... responsible position would support such idiocy, it does indeed call for the ... USN to rapidly field a conventionally armed Trident, ... to read the report instead of just sounding off. ... Ballistic missile launch! ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: QDR Released
    ... responsible position would support such idiocy, it does indeed call for the ... USN to rapidly field a conventionally armed Trident, ... Sorry, but Kevin is correct, as you would have learned if you bothered ... to read the report instead of just sounding off. ...
    (sci.military.naval)