Trident Satellite Launch WAS Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3006@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jan 2006 21:12:45 -0800
Leadfoot wrote:
> "Brian Allardice" <dba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:90l3t1p3t54oa9rlile9156lcl6hcs8uu5@xxxxxxxxxx
> > On 21 Jan 2006 02:05:07 GMT, dg411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Andre Lieven)
> > wrote:
> >
> >>The real issue here, is that there really isn't much of a mission
> >>for such a thing to accomplish, that existing weapons can't already
> >>fulfil.
> >
> > It has to be a money thing. Cost per kg of explosive delivered by
> > Trident or by cruise missile/aircraft/donkey, including costs of
> > delivery systems. I don't see a conventional trident as cost
> > effective, although no doubt a bonanza for various contractors.
>
> Cost of the delivery system is already paid for. The only other use is
> launching satellites into LEO and I think a submarine is a poor platform to
> that with.
True that, but for ones nearing the end of their service life, it might
be an idea. The Russians did it with some of their Typhoon-launched
missiles. Of course, the launcher business isn't what it was cracked
out to be 15 or so years ago :(
If only there was a way to launch International Space Station
components that way....
> > Cheers,
> > dba
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trident Satellite Launch WAS Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Trident Satellite Launch WAS Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: Trident Satellite Launch WAS Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- References:
- Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: dumpster4
- Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: John Lansford
- Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: Brian Allardice
- Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- From: Leadfoot
- Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- Prev by Date: Re: New Ustafish Listing
- Next by Date: Re: NATO Sea Sparrow's capability against supersonic targets?
- Previous by thread: Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- Next by thread: Re: Trident Satellite Launch WAS Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading