Re: Modern Gunships
- From: "Kevin Brooks" <brooksvmi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:15:26 -0500
"Arved Sandstrom" <asandstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:k9KAf.90246$m05.64232@xxxxxxxxxxx
> "Kevin Brooks" <brooksvmi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:IemdnZEUqdA-m03eRVn-gA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
> [ SNIP ]
>> Should we also remember which service debauched from the PI (except for
>
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> "debauched"? Freudian slip on your part? Although it may have been a
> pleasing thought. :-)
>
> Incidentally, a narrow military terminology nitpick...the word you meant
> doesn't correspond to retreat.
Actually, the intransitive verb form means to "indulge in dissipation". The
USN, for understandable reasons, certainly did "dissipate" during the PI
Campaign in 41/42.
Brooks
>
>> those poor sialors left behind to fight as more poor bloody infantry...)
>> while the troops were fighting? That is sort of a low blow, but anybody
>> trying to claim that the USN was "more forward deployed" than the other
>> services during WWII needs to have their head examined.
>
> AHS
>
>
.
- References:
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Tim Jordan
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: TOliver
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: dott.piergiorgio
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: TOliver
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: John D Salt
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: TOliver
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Tim Jordan
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Andre Lieven
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: aminyard
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Modern Gunships
- From: Arved Sandstrom
- Re: Modern Gunships
- Prev by Date: Re: Conventionally-Armed Trident Missiles.
- Next by Date: Re: Churchill OT.
- Previous by thread: Re: Modern Gunships
- Next by thread: Re: Modern Gunships
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading