Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- From: "Arved Sandstrom" <asandstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:07:25 GMT
<kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:56qdnfT4ZolHAzjeRVnyiQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <4fqdnYnihJ_E4TjenZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> brooksvmi@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Kevin Brooks) wrote:
>
> > they have no earthly
> > idea how to adjust the next rounds in terms of azimuth and
> > elevation to acheive the desired results.
>
> Fair enough, it is not a subject I claim any experience off, but still
> just one calculation not the two Vince claims.
Well, effectively it's still two calculations. Even with a laser plot from a
GPS-equipped observer, *somebody* (whether the observer or the FDC) still
needs to know where the observer is.
AHS
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- References:
- Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- From: kenney
- Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- Prev by Date: Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- Next by Date: Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- Previous by thread: Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- Next by thread: Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
