sci.military.naval

• Date Index

---

• Hontoria naval guns 1890's, old hoodoo
• Re: Bush Regime's Articles of Impeachment, Matt Wiser
• New Year, george
• Re: 7 things G.W. Bush has in common with Adolf Hitler, Matt Wiser
• Degree of Obligation, John P. Mullen
  • Re: Degree of Obligation, Jack Love
    • Re: Degree of Obligation, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Degree of Obligation, Jack Love
      • Re: Degree of Obligation, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Degree of Obligation, Jack Love
• A little late for natural selection, unfortunately., Pete Granzeau
  • Re: A little late for natural selection, unfortunately., Jack Linthicum
    • Re: A little late for natural selection, unfortunately., Pete Granzeau
      • Re: A little late for natural selection, unfortunately., Sarah Hotdesking
• Re: Marine General on Purpose of the US Military, Michael P . Reed
• Justice Department Probing Domestic Spying Leak, NSA, Prisons, Jack Linthicum
• China's Defense Industry Emerging from Its Troubled Past, Mike
• Re: _Capote_ [2005], kenney
  • Re: _Capote_ [2005], William Hamblen
• Navy Chaplain Enters Tenth Day of Hunger Strike, Otis Willie
• Hunley scientists find clues to vessel's demise, Otis Willie
  • Re: Hunley scientists find clues to vessel's demise, Jack Linthicum
• NavNews for Wednesday, December 28, 2005, Otis Willie
• Farewell Message from the 73rd Secretary of the Navy, Otis Willie
• Police released US sailor arrested for hit-and-run due to accord, Otis Willie
• "Rumsfeld's top 3 aides moved up succession chain", Mike
• "China raps sanctions for Iran arms sales", Mike
• Contest for crew member of USTAFISH, g lof2
• Mutating Missiles, Mark Borgerson
  • Re: Mutating Missiles, Howard C. Berkowitz
• WW2 Japanese internment, dbohara
  • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John Redman
    • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, old hoodoo
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, pigdos
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Allardice
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, scott s.
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Allardice
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, ray o'hara
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Love
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, TOliver
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Love
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brad Meyer
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Allardice
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, TOliver
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brad Meyer
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, aminyard
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Hamblen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Thomas Schoene
  • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Eystein Roll Aarseth
    • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, a425couple
  • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John Szalay
    • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, waltbj01
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Black
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Black
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Love
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jeff
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Black
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Andrew Bunting
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Black
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Andrew Bunting
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, William Black
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Jim Watt
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Jim Watt
      • Re: WW2 radio comms, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Black
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, M. J. Powell
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Guy Alcala
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, CJ Adams
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, TOliver
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, John P. Mullen
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jeff
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jeff
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jeff
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Floyd L. Davidson
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, William Black
      • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, a425couple
  • Re: WW2 Japanese internment, Brad Meyer
• Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, KDR
  • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Andrew Chaplin
  • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, aminyard
    • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Guy Alcala
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Brett
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Michael Kelly
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Guy Alcala
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Was Harpoon ever integrated into A-7 Corsair II?, Guy Alcala
• Dave Touretzky, the net-lifter, Barbara Schwarz
• Re: It's Mao Or Never, PaPaPeng
• Secretary of Defence - Order of Succession Change, John P. Mullen
  • Re: Secretary of Defence - Order of Succession Change, news.ic.net
• Re: MARINES REASSESSING STANDARD 5.56 MM ROUNDS FOR FIGHTING INSURGENTS, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Left wing spin on nuclear radiation., Jack Linthicum
• Re: thank you poland, William Black
• Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Sarah Hotdesking
  • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), David Biddulph
    • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), David Biddulph
  • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Thomas Schoene
  • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Starshiy Nemo
    • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Jeff
      • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), BF Lake
      • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Jeff
  • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Dave Deep
    • Re: Naval Pics (need IDs/info), Sarah Hotdesking
• NGFS Mission, dwelsh46
  • Re: NGFS Mission, Brian Allardice
    • Re: NGFS Mission, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Keith W
      • Re: NGFS Mission, TOliver
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Keith W
  • Re: NGFS Mission, Andrew C . Toppan
  • Re: NGFS Mission, aminyard
    • Re: NGFS Mission, Jim Yanik
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Andrew C . Toppan
  • Re: NGFS Mission, Keith Willshaw
    • Re: NGFS Mission, William Black
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Howard C. Berkowitz
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: NGFS Mission, Howard C. Berkowitz
• Re: Batman Begins [2005], Andrew Chaplin
• 1897 Elswick 6" Naval Ordnance question, old hoodoo
  • Re: 1897 Elswick 6" Naval Ordnance question, dott.piergiorgio
• Re: Why does Somalia have territorial waters?, Freddie Clark
  • Re: Why does Somalia have territorial waters?, Ian MacLure
• The 1914 Christmas Truce, Bryn
• Quadriennial review and the 2007 Pentagon budget due in February, Jack Linthicum
• Re: "Woody Allen Is Mediocre And Makes Miserable Films": WoodyAllen, Bill
• Embargo of Japan, dbohara
  • Re: Embargo of Japan, ray o'hara
  • Re: Embargo of Japan, Henry J Cobb
    • Re: Embargo of Japan, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, dbohara
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, PaPaPeng
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, dbohara
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, dbohara
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, a425couple
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Keith W
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, L'acrobat
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, L'acrobat
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, L'acrobat
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, John Lansford
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, TOliver
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Vince
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Vince
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Keith W
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, John Lansford
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Mark Bradford
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Love
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, John Lansford
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Vince
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, PaPaPeng
      • Re: Embargo of Japan, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Embargo of Japan, a425couple
• Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, SteveR
  • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, SteveR
    • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, Brian Allardice
      • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, Eystein Roll Aarseth
      • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, SteveR
    • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, SteveR
  • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, dwelsh46
    • Re: Why aren't the world's navies combating piracy?, Bob
• Question about chain of command if Admiral's on ship, thor-moller
  • Re: Question about chain of command if Admiral's on ship, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: Question about chain of command if Admiral's on ship, Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: Question about chain of command if Admiral's on ship, Andrew C . Toppan
• Re: Das Boot [1982], eugene
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Das Boot [1982], eugene
  • Re: Das Boot [1982], eugene
  • Re: Das Boot [1982], kenney
    • Re: Das Boot [1982], Jack Love
      • Re: Das Boot [1982], Alistair Gunn
      • Re: Das Boot [1982], Jack Love
• Re: Monty Python -- "We Were So Poor", eugene
• "Top general anticipates cut in troops - Iraq", Mike
• Norman Dane Vaughan, 100; Went to South Pole With Byrd, Jack Linthicum
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر, Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر, Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
• Re: Senior Political Officials & Intelligence Sources & Methods, PaPaPeng
• Thinking on..., dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Thinking on..., old hoodoo
• Fate of USCGC Storis (WMEC-38)?, SteveR
  • Re: Fate of USCGC Storis (WMEC-38)?, Andrew C . Toppan
    • Re: Fate of USCGC Storis (WMEC-38)?, SteveR
• Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, waltbj01
  • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Glenn Dowdy
  • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Brian Allardice
    • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Tank Fixer
  • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, John Mianowski
  • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Tank Fixer
  • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, dwelsh46
    • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, waltbj01
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Jack Love
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, waltbj01
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Jim Yanik
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, John Mianowski
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Tank Fixer
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Tank Fixer
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Peter Kemp
      • Re: Iowa and Wisconsin to museums, Jack Love
• Speech: John Paul Jones: Sailor, Hero, Father of the American Navy, Otis Willie
• USS Pasadena Returns from Western Pacific Deployment, Otis Willie
• Navy housing to get $250 million overhaul, Otis Willie
  • Re: Navy housing to get $250 million overhaul, waltbj01
• Greenland's ice loss doubled in 2005, Jack Linthicum
• christmas at sea, max
  • Re: christmas at sea, dott.piergiorgio
• Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., Joe Osman
      • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., Joe Osman
    • Re: Say hello to Moniatus (or Monietus) Capito, the first image of a Roman imperial navy officer ever discovered., Bryn
• American Empire, PaPaPeng
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: American Empire, PaPaPeng
• Leita Faye Engels, Admiral, "war on God", Laura
  • Re: Leita Faye Engels, Admiral, "war on God", Laura
• Re: New Pistols Ordered By U.S. Army, Jim Yanik
• The 2006 Defense Authorization Bill: What it means for you, Otis Willie
• DoD Releases Surveys on the Reserve Components and Military, Otis Willie
• It Isn’t Easy Being the Sexy Bin Laden, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: It Isn’t Easy Being the Sexy Bin Laden, Brian Allardice
• SMN Night Before Xmas, Sarah Hotdesking
  • Re: SMN Night Before Xmas, Jack Linthicum
• British Royal Fleet Auxiliary support ship, Mike
  • Re: British Royal Fleet Auxiliary support ship, Brian Sharrock
    • Re: British Royal Fleet Auxiliary support ship, David Biddulph
  • Re: British Royal Fleet Auxiliary support ship, Alistair Gunn
• Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Andrew Robert Breen
  • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Vince
    • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Vince
    • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Bryn
  • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, Jack Love
  • Re: Happy Humbug to the assembled multitude, george
• Gunning for a turkey, Vince
• Fred Kaplan of Slate complains about expense of LCS, Henry J Cobb
• Main guns on warships, Mark Bradford
  • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
    • Re: Main guns on warships, Jim Yanik
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Jim Yanik
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Thomas Schoene
    • Re: Main guns on warships, Mark Bradford
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: Main guns on warships, Andrew C . Toppan
    • Re: Main guns on warships, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Vince
      • Re: Main guns on warships, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Vince
      • Re: Main guns on warships, ray o'hara
      • Re: Main guns on warships, waltbj01
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Main guns on warships, TOliver
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Vince
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Alistair Gunn
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Jim Yanik
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Ian MacLure
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Jim Yanik
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Ian MacLure
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Ian MacLure
      • Re: Main guns on warships, TOliver
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Main guns on warships, TOliver
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Main guns on warships, krztalizer
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Ian MacLure
      • Re: Main guns on warships, kenney
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Main guns on warships, kenney
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Taki Kogoma
  • Re: Main guns on warships, krztalizer
  • Re: Main guns on warships, dwelsh46
    • Re: Main guns on warships, aminyard
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Mark Bradford
      • Re: Main guns on warships, BF Lake
      • Re: Main guns on warships, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Main guns on warships, BF Lake
      • Re: Main guns on warships, William Hughes
      • Re: Main guns on warships, Ken Chaddock
      • Re: Main guns on warships, aminyard
      • Re: Main guns on warships, TOliver
      • Re: Main guns on warships, BF Lake
      • Re: Main guns on warships, kenney
      • Re: Main guns on warships, BF Lake
      • Re: Main guns on warships, kenney
      • Re: Main guns on warships, BF Lake
  • Re: Main guns on warships, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• GOP Blocks Action on Senate Intelligence Authorization Bill, Jack Linthicum
• Re: How to attack Iran with ships ???, Stuart Chapman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How to attack Iran with ships ???, Tank Fixer
• Alternative German nuke history, dbohara
  • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Glenn Dowdy
  • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
    • Re: Alternative German nuke history, William Black
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Vince
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, William Hamblen
  • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
    • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, kenney
    • Re: Alternative German nuke history, William Hamblen
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, mike
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, William Hamblen
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, mike
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, kenney
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
  • Re: Alternative German nuke history, ray o'hara
    • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Vince
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Vince
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternative German nuke history, John Lansford
  • Re: Alternative German nuke history, L'acrobat
    • Re: Alternative German nuke history, waltbj01
• Statement from attorney general tom reilly on new coast guard, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Wednesday, December 21, 2005, Otis Willie
• Basnight condemns proposed Navy sonar field, Otis Willie
• Alternate ww2 history, dbohara
  • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Peter Skelton
    • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Seawolf
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Seawolf
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Love
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Seawolf
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jim McLaughlin
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Seawolf
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Seawolf
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Love
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, L'acrobat
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Taki Kogoma
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Seawolf
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, L'acrobat
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, John Mianowski
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Vince
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Vince
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Vince
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, John Mianowski
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Love
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, L'acrobat
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, L'acrobat
  • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Keith W
  • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
    • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dbohara
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Keith W
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, kenney
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, John Lansford
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, L'acrobat
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: Alternate ww2 history, Duke of URL
• OT: Where they now? Linda Tripp and her wiener ranch, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: OT: Where they now? Linda Tripp and her wiener ranch, scott s.
    • Re: OT: Where they now? Linda Tripp and her wiener ranch, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: OT: Where they now? Linda Tripp and her wiener ranch, scott s.
• Clark G. Reynolds dies, Jim Beaver
• Re: Bush Must Answer to the People, Billzz
• "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Mike
  • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", William Black
    • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Mike
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jim McLaughlin
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", aminyard
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Duke of URL
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", redc1c4
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Duke of URL
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Vince Brannigan
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Seawolf
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Vince Brannigan
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Mike Weeks
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Seawolf
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Vince
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Mike Weeks
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", William Black
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", William Black
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", William Black
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Brian Sharrock
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Jack Love
      • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Ian Birchenough
    • Re: "Navy diver's killer held in Beirut", Duke of URL
• French Marines video., Jack Love
  • Re: French Marines video., Yeff
    • Re: French Marines video., Duke of URL
      • Re: French Marines video., Peter Kemp
  • Re: French Marines video., ray o'hara
  • Re: French Marines video., ray o'hara
    • Re: French Marines video., Jack Love
      • Re: French Marines video., ray o'hara
    • Re: French Marines video., CJ Adams
      • Re: French Marines video., ray o'hara
      • Re: French Marines video., CJ Adams
      • Re: French Marines video., Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: French Marines video., Joe Osman
  • Re: French Marines video., Duke of URL
• Nuclear Submarine Cruiser Sets Off, Otis Willie
• Aus Army gets six new landing craft, Otis Willie
• Local organizer looking for support for Fleet Reserve Association, Otis Willie
• DoD Security Clearance, gerg1031
  • Re: DoD Security Clearance, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: DoD Security Clearance, Tank Fixer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • DoD Security Clearance, gerg1031
    • Re: DoD Security Clearance, Charlie Wolf
• Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, pigdos
  • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Keith W
  • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Andy Dingley
    • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, pigdos
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, John Lansford
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Gernot Hassenpflug
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, pigdos
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Japanese IJN: any shipbourne radar?, Jack Love
• Re: Clinton, and Carter, singed executive orders for secret searches on American (without court orders), Mark Borgerson
• Revolt of the Professionals, Jack Linthicum
• "Japanese strategy at 1921-22 Washington conf found in secret files", Mike
  • Re: "Japanese strategy at 1921-22 Washington conf found in secret files", Gernot Hassenpflug
    • Re: "Japanese strategy at 1921-22 Washington conf found in secret files", scott s.
      • Re: "Japanese strategy at 1921-22 Washington conf found in secret files", Mike
      • Re: "Japanese strategy at 1921-22 Washington conf found in secret files", scott s.
• Navy reassurances on sonar hold little sway with NC panel, Otis Willie
• House OKs defense bill that includes military pay raise, Otis Willie
• Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", dbohara
  • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", dbohara
  • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Keith W
    • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", dbohara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Matt Wiser
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Keith W
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Jack Love
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Keith W
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Turtledove's Days of Infamy, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Andrew Venor
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", John Lansford
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Michael P . Reed
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", John Lansford
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", John Lansford
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", ray o'hara
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", kenney
      • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", John Lansford
  • Re: Turtledove's "Days of Infamy", Brian Allardice
• Re: Eisenhower & MacArthur, Michael P . Reed
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Eisenhower & MacArthur, Michael P . Reed
    • Re: Eisenhower & MacArthur, aminyard
• Spending bill spares major weapons programs from big cuts, Cap'n Crunch
• Bush Empowers Shiite fundmentalists in Iraq, Vince
• Storms sink treasure hopes Hunters find few valuables, Jack Linthicum
• Midway hull based on Montana ??, bw
  • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, eugene
    • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, William Hamblen
    • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Nik Simpson
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, sidishus
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, bw
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, JustMe
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, John Lansford
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Vince
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Brad Meyer
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Brad Meyer
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, John Mianowski
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Brad Meyer
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, John Mianowski
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, William Hamblen
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Ian MacLure
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, kenney
      • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, kenney
  • Re: Midway hull based on Montana ??, Jack Linthicum
• Re: U.S. Sub May Have Toured Canadian Arctic Zone, Laskin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: U.S. Sub May Have Toured Canadian Arctic Zone, Michael P . Reed
    • Re: U.S. Sub May Have Toured Canadian Arctic Zone, Andrew Chaplin
• X Craft Diver Obit, Ian MacLure
  • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Scott M. Kozel
  • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, redc1c4
    • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Jack Love
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Gordon Dundas
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Gordon Dundas
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, John Dallman
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Andy Dingley
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, John Dallman
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Andy Dingley
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Peter McLelland
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Keith W
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Gordon Dundas
      • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, Scott M. Kozel
  • Re: X Craft Diver Obit, George Lakey
• CBO: Resource Implications of the Navy's 313-Ship Plan., Mike
• Re: Paul J. Adam's Slow And Embarrassing DEATH UNDER MUCH BUNGLING (DUMB), Jim McLaughlin
• Some of Hines favorite sources, Jack Linthicum
• Pentagon's Intelligence Authority Widens, Fact Sheet Details Secretive Agency's Growth From Focus on Policy to Counterterrorism, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Michael P . Reed
  • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Kevin Brooks
    • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Michael P . Reed
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Kevin Brooks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Michael P . Reed
  • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Michael P . Reed
  • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Michael P . Reed
    • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, aminyard
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, aminyard
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, William Black
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Wearing Someone Else's Medals, Michael P . Reed
• Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, Jim Yanik
  • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, John P. Mullen
    • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, Jim Yanik
      • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, John P. Mullen
  • "The president had, I think, made up a law that we never passed."Last year, the high court rejected, 8 to 1, Bush's claim that he had the power as commander in chief to hold and detain Americans without a hearing,, Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The New York Times -- Giving Aid & Comfort To The Enemy, Jim Yanik
• Rear Admiral, Sarah Hotdesking
• Marines go to the mat, hobbitfan111
• Re: Murtha Says The Troops "Can't Do It", aminyard
• "Marines go to the mat", Mike
• Plea Deal Is Accepted In Spy Case, no, not that one, Jack Linthicum
• NavNews for Friday, December 16, 2005, Otis Willie
• Trafalgar Strategery, dbohara
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Keith W
    • Re: Trafalgar Strategies, John Dallman
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, old hoodoo
    • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Andrew Robert Breen
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, ray o'hara
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Nicholas Smid
    • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, a425couple
    • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Peter McLelland
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, John P. Mullen
    • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, John Dallman
      • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, William Black
      • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Peter Skelton
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, old hoodoo
  • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, old hoodoo
    • Re: Trafalgar Strategery, Keith W
• Troubles of a Lockheed Tool Girl, Sarah Hotdesking
• Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Sarah Hotdesking
  • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Jim Watt
    • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, William Black
    • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Jim E
    • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Brian Allardice
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Keith W
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, William Black
      • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, Keith Willshaw
  • Re: Battle of TRAFALGAR (1805) by 2005 Rules, aminyard
• Re: Qaeda-Iraq Link U.S. Cited Is Tied to Coercion Claim, Mark Borgerson
  • Re: Qaeda-Iraq Link U.S. Cited Is Tied to Coercion Claim, Fred J . McCall
• Re: 5"/54 Mark 45 detailed information, Thomas Schoene
• Admiral Thoms Collins Nominated For Honorary DEA Special Agent, Otis Willie
• Veterans' groups to restore submarine memorial, Otis Willie
• SUBASE to Sailors: Be safe this holiday, Otis Willie
• US Seabees turnover operations, Otis Willie
• german navy in ww2, Laskin
  • Re: german navy in ww2, Thomas Schoene
    • Re: german navy in ww2, waltbj01
    • Re: german navy in ww2, John P. Mullen
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John P. Mullen
      • Re: german navy in ww2, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith W
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John P. Mullen
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Derek Lyons
      • Re: german navy in ww2, redc1c4
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith W
      • Re: german navy in ww2, William Black
      • Re: german navy in ww2, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: german navy in ww2, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: german navy in ww2, tw
      • Re: german navy in ww2, William Black
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John Dallman
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John Dallman
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Errol Cavit
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: german navy in ww2, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John Dallman
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith Willshaw
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John P. Mullen
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith W
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John P. Mullen
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith W
      • Re: german navy in ww2, William Hughes
    • Re: german navy in ww2, Andrew Robert Breen
  • Re: german navy in ww2, TOliver
    • Re: german navy in ww2, John Mianowski
      • Re: german navy in ww2, William Hughes
      • Re: german navy in ww2, eugene
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Keith W
      • Re: german navy in ww2, eugene
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Tank Fixer
    • Re: german navy in ww2, eugene
  • Re: german navy in ww2, ray o'hara
    • Re: german navy in ww2, John Dallman
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Jack Love
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John Dallman
      • Re: german navy in ww2, mike
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Jack Love
      • Re: german navy in ww2, ray o'hara
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Drazen Kramaric
      • Re: german navy in ww2, kenney
      • Re: german navy in ww2, Peter Skelton
      • Re: german navy in ww2, John Dallman
      • Re: german navy in ww2, kenney
      • Re: german navy in ww2, TOliver
      • Re: german navy in ww2, eugene
      • Re: german navy in ww2, William Vickrey
  • Re: german navy in ww2, William Black
  • Re: german navy in ww2, Tank Fixer
• NavNews for Thursday, December 15, 2005, Otis Willie
• Royal Navy set to launch 'D' Class destoyer, Otis Willie
• US military services said working together better, Otis Willie
• Anyone else having trouble with the newsgroup?, John Lansford
  • Re: Anyone else having trouble with the newsgroup?, Thomas Schoene
  • Re: Anyone else having trouble with the newsgroup?, walt moffett
  • Re: Anyone else having trouble with the newsgroup?, John P. Mullen
    • Re: Anyone else having trouble with the newsgroup?, Eystein Roll Aarseth
• America's New Plan, Cap'n Crunch
  • Re: America's New Plan, Starshiy Nemo
  • Re: America's New Plan, William Black
    • Re: America's New Plan, TOliver
      • Re: America's New Plan, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: America's New Plan, William Black
      • Re: America's New Plan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: America's New Plan, TOliver
      • Re: America's New Plan, William Black
      • Re: America's New Plan, Andrew Venor
      • Re: America's New Plan, William Black
      • Re: America's New Plan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: America's New Plan, William Black
      • Re: America's New Plan, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: America's New Plan, TOliver
      • Re: America's New Plan, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: America's New Plan, Keith W
      • Re: America's New Plan, William Black
      • Re: America's New Plan, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: America's New Plan, Brian Sharrock
  • Re: America's New Plan, Brian Sharrock
• Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
    • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Report: Bush Had More Prewar Intelligence Than Congress, Fred J . McCall
• USTAFISH missing?, Paul H. Lemmen
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Glenn Dowdy
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, redc1c4
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jeff Crowell
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, John Dallman
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Kemp
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, eugene
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Wigbert Meyer
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Wigbert Meyer
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Skelton
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Paul J. Adam
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Bob McKellar
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Tim Jordan
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jim Watt
    • Message not available
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jim Watt
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, jeffreysmidt
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Joachim Schmid
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Andrew Chaplin
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, aminyard
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Skelton
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jeff Crowell
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, David Phillips
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Duke of URL
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Duke of URL
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Harry Bennett
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jim Watt
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, redc1c4
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah H
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Harry Bennett
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Harry Bennett
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Howard C. Berkowitz
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, g lof2
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Tim Jordan
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, g lof2
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Harry Bennett
      • All-time WORST commercial beer; WAS: USTAFISH missing?, Duke of URL
      • Re: All-time WORST commercial beer; WAS: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Love
      • Re: All-time WORST commercial beer; WAS: USTAFISH missing?, Howard C. Berkowitz
      • Re: All-time WORST commercial beer; WAS: USTAFISH missing?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: All-time WORST commercial beer; WAS: USTAFISH missing?, g lof2
      • Re: All-time WORST commercial beer; WAS: USTAFISH missing?, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Duke of URL
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Harry Bennett
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Tim Jordan
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, John Mianowski
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, alumshubby
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, CJ Adams
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter McLelland
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, CJ Adams
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, BlackBeard
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Paul H. Lemmen
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Kemp
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Paul H. Lemmen
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Paul H. Lemmen
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Peter Skelton
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Al Dykes
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Paul J. Adam
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Andrew Chaplin
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Glenn Dowdy
  • Re: USTAFISH missing?, BlackBeard
    • Re: USTAFISH missing?, Vince Brannigan
• Aging Heavy Icebreakers, no money for maintainance, replacement, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, PDR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, PDR
    • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, William Black
      • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, William Black
      • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, Andrew Robert Breen
      • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, William Black
      • Re: Brits Forbid Free Speech Within One Kilometer Of 10 Downing Street, PDR
• Firepower some definitions, Jack Love
  • Re: Firepower some definitions, John P. Mullen
    • Re: Firepower some definitions, Jack Love
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, Jack Love
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, Jack Love
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, Jack Love
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Firepower some definitions, Jack Love
• Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Jack Love
  • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Jeff Crowell
    • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Andrew Chaplin
  • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Vince Brannigan
    • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Jack Love
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., kenney
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., John P. Mullen
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., TOliver
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Peter Skelton
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., BF Lake
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., kenney
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Tank Fixer
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., redc1c4
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Tank Fixer
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., redc1c4
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Tank Fixer
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Tank Fixer
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., kenney
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Direct and Indirect fire a set of definitions., Kevin Brooks
• Why doesn't John Clerk get credit for Nelson's tactics at Trafalgar?, stevebesley
  • Re: Why doesn't John Clerk get credit for Nelson's tactics at Trafalgar?, old hoodoo
  • Re: Why doesn't John Clerk get credit for Nelson's tactics at Trafalgar?, DM
  • Re: Why doesn't John Clerk get credit for Nelson's tactics at Trafalgar?, Keith W
• Threat levels, Jack Love
  • Re: Threat levels, Alistair Gunn
  • Re: Threat levels, pigdos
    • Re: Threat levels, William Black
    • Re: Threat levels, Jack Love
      • Re: Threat levels, old hoodoo
      • Re: Threat levels, Jack Love
    • Re: Threat levels, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Threat levels, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Threat levels, Jack Love
      • Re: Threat levels, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Threat levels, Jack Love
    • Re: Threat levels, Fred J . McCall
• 5" guns 1890's through WII, old hoodoo
  • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, mike
    • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, old hoodoo
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, mike
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, old hoodoo
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, mike
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, William Hamblen
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, mike
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, kenney
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, William Hamblen
  • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, Nicholas Smid
  • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, Joe Osman
    • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, kenney
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, Ian MacLure
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, Joe Osman
      • Re: 5" guns 1890's through WII, kenney
• USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Henry J Cobb
  • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Thomas Schoene
    • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Thomas Schoene
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Thomas Schoene
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Thomas Schoene
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Henry J Cobb
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Thomas Schoene
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Peter Kemp
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., scott s.
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Pete Granzeau
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., scott s.
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Peter Kemp
      • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Andrew C . Toppan
    • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Andrew C . Toppan
    • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Duke of URL
  • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Andrew C . Toppan
  • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Andrew C . Toppan
    • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Henry J Cobb
    • Re: USS Freedom will be a drug ship., Thomas Schoene
• Navy Seaman MIA from World War II is Identified -- News Releases:, Otis Willie
• Housing Allowance Rules to Change Dec. 31, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Wednesday, December 14, 2005, Otis Willie
• SECNAV Releases 2005 Holiday Message, Otis Willie
• Admiral Thomas Collins: Honorary Special Agent of the Year Candidates, Otis Willie
• Ship to ship, Laskin
  • Re: Ship to ship, ray o'hara
    • Re: Ship to ship, Joachim Schmid
    • Re: Ship to ship, Vince
      • Re: Ship to ship, ray o'hara
      • Re: Ship to ship, old hoodoo
      • Re: Ship to ship, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Ship to ship, ray o'hara
      • Re: Ship to ship, William Black
      • Re: Ship to ship, Jack Love
      • Re: Ship to ship, Andy Dingley
    • Re: Ship to ship, Brian Allardice
    • Re: Ship to ship, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Ship to ship, Joachim Schmid
  • Re: Ship to ship, dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Ship to ship, redc1c4
    • Re: Ship to ship, Peter McLelland
      • Re: Ship to ship, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Ship to ship, Peter McLelland
      • Re: Ship to ship, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Ship to ship, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Ship to ship, redc1c4
      • Re: Ship to ship, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Ship to ship, David Phillips
      • Re: Ship to ship, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Ship to ship, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Ship to ship, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Ship to ship, redc1c4
      • Re: Ship to ship, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Ship to ship, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Ship to ship, Tank Fixer
      • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Ship to ship, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Ship to ship, Sarah H
      • Re: Ship to ship, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Ship to ship, ray o'hara
      • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Ship to ship, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: Ship to ship, george
      • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Ship to ship, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Ship to ship, Peter Kemp
    • Re: Ship to ship, Weatherlawyer
• Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, PaPaPeng
  • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, William Black
    • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Love
    • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, William Black
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, William Black
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, William Black
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, William Black
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, William Black
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Tom Royer
    • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Fred J . McCall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, PaPaPeng
    • Re: Is _King Kong_ Racist?, Jack Linthicum
• GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Mike
  • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Peter Kemp
    • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Henry J Cobb
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Jim Yanik
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Paul J. Adam
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Keith W
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Henry J Cobb
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Thomas Schoene
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Peter Skelton
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., dott.piergiorgio
    • Message not available
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Thomas Schoene
      • Message not available
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Thomas Schoene
      • Message not available
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Mark Andrew Spence
      • Message not available
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Thomas Schoene
      • Message not available
      • Re: GAO: Issues Related to Navy Battleships., Tank Fixer
• Re: OIL NAZIS on VERGE of DEFEAT - "Mission Accomplished!", Seawolf
  • Message not available
    • Re: OIL NAZIS on VERGE of DEFEAT -, Matt Wiser
• Coast Guard Identifies Hoax Callers, Otis Willie
• Navy Announces Command Senior Chief Board Details, Otis Willie
• Boost for navy's warfare sailors, Otis Willie
• Perpetual motion machine invented, news
• Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, news
  • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, Duke of URL
      • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, Jim Yanik
  • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, Dean A. Markley
    • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, redc1c4
      • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, ray o'hara
      • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, William Black
      • Re: Russia Ready to Vaporize Israel, Jack Linthicum
• Re: 'China Will Nuke US', simens
  • Re: 'China Will Nuke US', Jim Yanik
    • Re: 'China Will Nuke US', Vince Brannigan
      • Re: 'China Will Nuke US', Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: 'China Will Nuke US', Jim Yanik
      • Re: 'China Will Nuke US', Vince Brannigan
• Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, aminyard
  • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Peter Skelton
    • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Michael P . Reed
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Michael P . Reed
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, aminyard
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Peter Skelton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Michael P . Reed
    • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, William Black
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Michael P . Reed
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, William Black
  • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, PaPaPeng
  • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Grey Satterfield
    • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Vince Brannigan
    • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Laurence Doering
      • Re: Canada Never Has To Tear The United States Down To Build Itself Up, Fred J . McCall
• HMS DARING, Mike
• Temp good bye to USENET (Rogers user), Gary J. MacDonald
• "Nation-building elevated", Mike
• Re: OIL NAZIS on VERGE of DEFEAT - in your dreams, traitor, Matt Wiser
• Harper: Idiot, Brian Allardice
• Bases in Panama, Mike
• an interesting of how dazzle might have worked, old hoodoo
  • Re: an interesting of how dazzle might have worked, Brian Allardice
    • Re: an interesting of how dazzle might have worked, Errol Cavit
      • Re: an interesting of how dazzle might have worked, Howard C. Berkowitz
      • Re: an interesting of how dazzle might have worked, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: an interesting of how dazzle might have worked, Andy Dingley
• Well this newsgroup is still shot, shite67
  • Re: Well this newsgroup is still shot, ray o'hara
  • Re: Well this newsgroup is still shot, John P. Mullen
  • Re: Well this newsgroup is still shot, Duke of URL
• Navy Chaplain May Lose Job for Praying In Name of Jesus, Otis Willie
• Commander says Kitty Hawk shouldn’t keep sailing past 2008, Otis Willie
• USNV Swift: A high-speed study in multi-tasking, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Monday, December 12, 2005, Otis Willie
• WW2 Naval Innovation, GHMyst
• Re: why did iraq hit the Stark?, Michael P . Reed
  • Re: why did iraq hit the Stark?, Mike Weeks
    • Re: why did iraq hit the Stark?, Mark Bradford
      • Re: why did iraq hit the Stark?, William Black
      • Re: why did iraq hit the Stark?, Mike Weeks
• Ships, Laskin
  • Re: Ships, John D Salt
    • Re: Ships, Laskin
    • Re: Ships, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Ships, William Hughes
      • Re: Ships, Keith W
      • Re: Ships, Peter Skelton
    • Re: Ships, Keith W
  • Re: Ships, ray o'hara
    • Re: Ships, Laskin
  • Re: Ships, dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Ships, mike
    • Re: Ships, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Ships, Laskin
      • Re: Ships, Peter McLelland
    • Re: Ships, Peter McLelland
  • Re: Ships, Laskin
    • Re: Ships, ray o'hara
• Not a new naval book, but a good one...., TOliver
  • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Eystein Roll Aarseth
  • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., old hoodoo
    • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., TOliver
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., TOliver
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., William Vickrey
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Duke of URL
  • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Mark Borgerson
    • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Brian Allardice
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., William Black
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Brian Allardice
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., TOliver
    • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Justin
  • Re: Not a new naval book, but a good one...., Joe Osman
• Re: "The Bayeux Tapestry", weasel
• Times of London: Iraq troop pull-out to begin in months, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Times of London: Iraq troop pull-out to begin in months, Mark Test
    • Re: Times of London: Iraq troop pull-out to begin in months, Jack Love
  • Re: Times of London: Iraq troop pull-out to begin in months, Paul J. Adam
• fuel for B* fans....., dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: fuel for B* fans....., Jack Love
  • Re: fuel for B* fans....., redc1c4
• The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Jack Linthicum
  • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Mark Test
    • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Tank Fixer
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., John P. Mullen
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., John P. Mullen
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Tank Fixer
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., John P. Mullen
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The Grinch Who Doctored PhotosThe RNC's fraudulent new ad., Tank Fixer
• Flight 19 "Lost Patrol" - 60th Anniversary, Scott M. Kozel
  • Re: Flight 19 "Lost Patrol" - 60th Anniversary, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Flight 19 "Lost Patrol" - 60th Anniversary, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Flight 19 "Lost Patrol" - 60th Anniversary, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Flight 19 "Lost Patrol" - 60th Anniversary, Thomas Schoene
• WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, Jim Barbieri
  • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, ray o'hara
    • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, Jim Barbieri
      • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, Joachim Schmid
  • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, Jim Barbieri
  • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, old hoodoo
  • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, old hoodoo
    • Re: WWI Sub Chaser Bo Peep, old hoodoo
• Re: As The Bush Impeachment Gets Closer: What are the risks to america from Deranged Bush-Lies-Regime, PaPaPeng
• GAO: Planned Investment in the Naval Tactical Command Support System Needs to be Reassessed., Mike
  • Re: GAO: Planned Investment in the Naval Tactical Command Support System Needs to be Reassessed., wfz
• Gene Bruce, 98; Last Known Survivor of 1923 Naval Disaster, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Gene Bruce, 98; Last Known Survivor of 1923 Naval Disaster, wfz
    • Re: Gene Bruce, 98; Last Known Survivor of 1923 Naval Disaster, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Gene Bruce, 98; Last Known Survivor of 1923 Naval Disaster, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: Gene Bruce, 98; Last Known Survivor of 1923 Naval Disaster, Jack Linthicum
• Photos: Cindy Sheehan in London, PaPaPeng
  • Re: Photos: Cindy Sheehan in London, Vaughn
• Re: Pentagon Hides 100,000 U.S. Casualities From Iraq and Afghanistan, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Pentagon Hides 100,000 U.S. Casualities From Iraq and Afghanistan, Mark Test
• Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, eugene
  • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, Peter McLelland
    • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, aminyard
      • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, kenney
  • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, BF Lake
    • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, eugene
  • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, Peter Skelton
    • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, aminyard
      • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, aminyard
  • Re: Profuse apologies for the on-topic post, William Hamblen
• Movies - "The Third Man", TOliver
  • Re: Movies - "The Third Man", aminyard
• The Impending Collapse of Arab Civilization, Tank Fixer
  • Re: The Impending Collapse of Arab Civilization, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Mark Borgerson
    • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Love
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Love
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Love
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Love
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Jack Love
      • Re: Since when does 'military service' make you a 'military expert'?, Mark Borgerson
• Re: Our Soldiers Are Watching, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Our Soldiers Are Watching, Cap'n Crunch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Our Soldiers Are Watching, Soren Larsen
• "U.S. official warns of 'catastrophic' weapons use", Mike
  • Re: "U.S. official warns of 'catastrophic' weapons use", Mark Test
• Racist impact in enlistments, old hoodoo
  • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Arved Sandstrom
  • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Mark Test
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, William Black
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Jack Linthicum
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Arved Sandstrom
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, John P. Mullen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Racist impact in enlistments, Fred J . McCall
• Re: North Dakota Dem To Party Chair Howard Dean: 'Shut Up'..., Jack Linthicum
  • Message not available
    • Re: North Dakota Dem To Party Chair Howard Dean: 'Shut Up'..., Jack Linthicum
  • Message not available
    • Re: North Dakota Dem To Party Chair Howard Dean: 'Shut Up'..., Fred J . McCall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: North Dakota Dem To Party Chair Howard Dean: 'Shut Up'..., Jack Linthicum
    • Re: North Dakota Dem To Party Chair Howard Dean: 'Shut Up'..., Mark Bradford
• Orlando Sentinel five day series on the Gulf of Mexico, Jack Linthicum
• Torp Over The Flight Deck?!?, Tim Jordan
  • Re: Torp Over The Flight Deck?!?, old hoodoo
• Re: Rapiers and stuff, John Dallman
  • Re: Rapiers and stuff, Paul J. Adam
• Re: Last Legitimately Elected Presdent, Bill Clinton, Says Bush Is 'Flat Wrong' on Kyoto, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Last Legitimately Elected Presdent, Bill Clinton, Says Bush Is 'Flat Wrong' on Kyoto, Jim McLaughlin
    • Re: Last Legitimately Elected Presdent, Bill Clinton, Says Bush Is 'Flat Wrong' on Kyoto, Earl
  • Re: Last Legitimately Elected Presdent, Bill Clinton, Says Bush Is 'Flat Wrong' on Kyoto, Mark Test
• US admits navy vessel beamed unauthorized radio waves in Oct, Otis Willie
  • Re: US admits navy vessel beamed unauthorized radio waves in Oct, Jack Linthicum
• Dreadnaught victory, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Dreadnaught victory, Ian MacLure
    • Re: Dreadnaught victory, redc1c4
      • Re: Dreadnaught victory, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Dreadnaught victory, William Vickrey
      • Re: Dreadnaught victory, Jack Linthicum
• armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
  • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, Keith W
  • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, Keith W
    • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, kenney
  • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, Michael P . Reed
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
    • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, old hoodoo
      • Re: armstrong 6" QF info needed, dott.piergiorgio
• Former Vietnam POW led US Naval Academy, Otis Willie
• Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq...[was Re: Looks like Dean has it about right - War is a Racket...[was Re: Dummycrat Howard Dean on Iraq (True Leadership), Jim Yanik
• If we did the French we can do the Chinese, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: If we did the US we can do the Chinese, Starshiy Nemo
    • Re: If we did the US we can do the Chinese, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: If we did the French we can do the Chinese, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Midway strategy?, John Lansford
  • Re: Midway strategy?, Jack Linthicum
    • French at Oran, Drazen Kramaric
      • Re: French at Oran, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: French at Oran, William Black
      • Re: French at Oran, Jack Love
      • Re: French at Oran, Peter McLelland
      • Re: French at Oran, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: French at Oran, Peter McLelland
      • Re: French at Oran, aminyard
      • Re: French at Oran, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: French at Oran, Peter McLelland
      • Re: French at Oran, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: French at Oran, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: French at Oran, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: French at Oran, William Black
      • Re: French at Oran, Keith W
      • Re: French at Oran, aminyard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Midway strategy?, Brad Meyer
    • Re: Midway strategy?, Errol Cavit
      • Re: Midway strategy?, Brad Meyer
• Uss America, Laskin
  • Re: Uss America, kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Uss America, Andrew C . Toppan
• Neocon death squads, news
  • Re: Neocon death squads, Duke of URL
  • Re: Neocon death squads, Charlie Wolf
    • Re: Neocon death squads, William Black
      • Re: Neocon death squads, Don Harstad
      • Re: Neocon death squads, William Black
      • Re: Neocon death squads, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Neocon death squads, William Black
      • Re: Neocon death squads, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Neocon death squads, Charlie Wolf
• Ramsey Clark's record, Mike
• "Pentagon sticks with 2-war plan", Mike
• Italian Harriers, Don Harstad
  • Re: Italian Harriers, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Italian Harriers, Dave Deep
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Alan Dicey
      • Re: Italian Harriers, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Thomas Schoene
    • Re: Italian Harriers, Thomas Schoene
    • Re: Italian Harriers, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Italian Harriers, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Italian Harriers, Don Harstad
  • Re: Italian Harriers, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: Italian Harriers, Don Harstad
• Military Families Learn Navy's Sub Performs Perfectly at North, Otis Willie
• Chaplain's Corner: Tis' the season, Otis Willie
• Hunt for Master Chief Petty Officer of the Coast Guard begins, Otis Willie
• Joint Enlisted PME Becomes Reality, Otis Willie
• US Military Declares Global Strike Capability, Otis Willie
• Pace seeks ideas from future top military leaders, Otis Willie
• Re: Iran's Ahmadinejad Says Israel Should Be Moved To Europe, Jim Yanik
  • Re: Iran's Ahmadinejad Says Israel Should Be Moved To Europe, Vince
  • Re: Iran's Ahmadinejad Says Israel Should Be Moved To Europe, NYC XYZ
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Iran's Ahmadinejad Says Israel Should Be Moved To Europe, Jim Yanik
• Darby's Tavern for Submariners, yzordderrex
• Carrier take off weights, William Black
  • Re: Carrier take off weights, BF Lake
  • Re: Carrier take off weights, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Carrier take off weights, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• The New Face of Naval Strike Warfare, Mike
• Pearl Harbor, Mark Bradford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • pearl Harbor, Laskin
• Re: Airline Passenger Who Made Threat Killed At Miami International Airport, PaPaPeng
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Airline Passenger Who Made Threat Killed At Miami International Airport, John D Salt
• Re: 7 December 1941, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: 7 December 1941, Vince Brannigan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
  • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
  • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
  • Re: 7 December 1941, John Lansford
  • Re: 7 December 1941, John Lansford
  • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
    • Re: 7 December 1941, kenney
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Keith W
      • Re: 7 December 1941, TOliver
      • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
      • Re: 7 December 1941, kenney
      • Re: 7 December 1941, mike
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Tank Fixer
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Taki Kogoma
      • Re: 7 December 1941, kenney
  • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
    • Re: 7 December 1941, William Black
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: 7 December 1941, William Black
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: 7 December 1941, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
    • Re: 7 December 1941, Tank Fixer
  • Re: 7 December 1941, aminyard
  • Re: 7 December 1941, kenney
• Delahunt honored by Coast Guard, Otis Willie
• Third Coast Guard patrol cutter ready for duty, Otis Willie
• Officer Shortages Hit Navy Special Forces, Otis Willie
• A young Navy wife meets the test of fire, Otis Willie
• Speech: Sweet Pea at War: A History of USS Portland National Archives, Otis Willie
• Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Otis Willie
  • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, ray o'hara
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jim Watt
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, ray o'hara
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, ray o'hara
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jim Watt
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, William Black
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, CJ Adams
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, William Black
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, William Black
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, scott s.
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, dott.piergiorgio
  • Update: Locksmith to Try to Open Two Submarine Safes, Jack Linthicum
• 56 Navy sailors are being cross-trained at Fort Jackson for, Otis Willie
• Navy edging nearer to foreign shores, Otis Willie
• Well, then..., Brian Allardice
  • Re: Well, then..., Andrew Chaplin
    • Re: Well, then..., Brian Allardice
      • Re: Well, then..., Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Well, then..., Brian Allardice
• Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., Jim Yanik
  • Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., Vince Brannigan
    • Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., Tank Fixer
  • Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., Jim Yanik
  • Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., Jim Yanik
  • Re: No WMDs = no basis for the illegal invasion of Iraq..., John D Salt
• Re: Howard Dean: US Won't Win in Iraq, Jim Yanik
  • Re: Howard Dean: US Won't Win in Iraq, Vince Brannigan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Howard Dean: US Won't Win in Iraq, Jim Yanik
    • Re: Howard Dean: US Won't Win in Iraq, Brian Sharrock
• Re: Rumsfeld Offers Optimistic View of Iraq - 12/5/2005, Jack Linthicum
• Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Allen Thomson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Allen Thomson
    • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Allen Thomson
    • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Allen Thomson
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Andrew C . Toppan
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Allen Thomson
      • Re: Picture of SBX on Blue Marlin, Andrew C . Toppan
• History Channel: Horace Bywater then FDR, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: History Channel: Anacortes Contractor builds replica of a 1100 year old Viking ship unearthed at Gokstad, Jack Linthicum
• If You Serve, You Deserve: A Call For Bonus March II, Otis Willie
• First steam-powered gunboat, KDR
  • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Andrew Robert Breen
    • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, KDR
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Andrew Robert Breen
    • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, kenney
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Soren Larsen
  • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, ray o'hara
    • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Nicholas Smid
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: First steam-powered gunboat, ray o'hara
• Re: Great Films, D. Spencer Hines
• What/Why this gap in the flight deck?, Jack Crane
  • Re: What/Why this gap in the flight deck?, William Hughes
  • Re: What/Why this gap in the flight deck?, Ian MacLure
    • Re: What/Why this gap in the flight deck?, Newby
      • Re: What/Why this gap in the flight deck?, dlwilson
    • Re: What/Why this gap in the flight deck?, Allen Thomson
• Lest we forget., Jack Love
  • Re: Lest we forget., dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: Lest we forget., Jack Love
• 06 Dec 2005 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Monday, December 05, 2005, Otis Willie
• Carrier announcement draws mixed reactions in Japan USFJ command touts capabilities Nimitz-class ship, Otis Willie
• Ten Marines killed during off base promotion ceremony December 1, Jack Linthicum
• Allawi Flees Mosque, PaPaPeng
• Third symposium on Shipbuilding on the Thames and Thames-built Ships, Mike
• Re: Is George Bush the Worst President Ever? Do Bears Shit in the Woods? -- GOP: the war-profiteering American TREASON Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, PaPaPeng
  • Re: Is George Bush the Worst President Ever? Do Bears Shit in the Woods? -- GOP: the war-profiteering American TREASON Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, Cap'n Crunch
    • Re: Is George Bush the Worst President Ever? Do Bears Shit in the Woods? -- GOP: the war-profiteering American TREASON Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Is George Bush the Worst President Ever? Do Bears Shit in the Woods? -- GOP: the war-profiteering American TREASON Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, TOliver
• "Rumsfeld scores press 'negativity'", Mike
• Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, William Black
    • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, Jack Love
      • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, William Black
      • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, Jack Love
      • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, William Black
      • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, Jack Love
    • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, Mark Test
    • Re: Iran Only Months Away From A Nuclear Weapon, dumpster4
• 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, BF Lake
  • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, BF Lake
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Keith W
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Keith W
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Peter Skelton
  • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Alan Dicey
  • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Peter Skelton
    • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, kenney
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
  • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, kenney
    • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, BF Lake
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, kenney
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question-More Photos, BF Lake
      • Re:Correction- 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question-More Photos, BF Lake
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question-More Photos, Peter Skelton
      • Re: 6" Gun AA Fuse Setter Question, Jack Love
• Midshipmen Resting An Affront To Bush, Military, Otis Willie
• Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., jkingo
    • Re: Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., dumpster4
      • Re: Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., dumpster4
      • Re: Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Beyond OT, Beyond Tasteless, Beyond You name it, Joe Dante's Brilliant Anti-war Horror Show., Jack Linthicum
• Attack from the Deep, Horace Hunley on Science Channel, Jack Linthicum
• Re: White Phosphorus -- "Willie Peter" -- And Marines In Fallujah, aminyard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: White Phosphorus -- "Willie Peter" -- And Marines In Fallujah, aminyard
  • Re: White Phosphorus -- "Willie Peter" -- And Marines In Fallujah, Arved Sandstrom
    • Re: White Phosphorus -- "Willie Peter" -- And Marines In Fallujah, John P. Mullen
      • Re: White Phosphorus -- "Willie Peter" -- And Marines In Fallujah, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: White Phosphorus -- "Willie Peter" -- And Marines In Fallujah, John P. Mullen
• Re: Second TIME Magazine reporter asked to testify on, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Pour You a Nice Cup of Shut the Fuck Up, dott.piergiorgio
• New Yamato movie, Catus
  • Re: New Yamato movie, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: New Yamato movie, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: New Yamato movie, Laskin
  • Re: New Yamato movie, Mark Borgerson
    • Re: New Yamato movie, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: New Yamato movie, dott.piergiorgio
• Navy to Expand Fleet With New Enemies in Mind, Jack Linthicum
• Dangerously on topic, Jim Watt
• Novak channels Hutchinson, Jack Love
  • Re: Novak channels Hutchinson, Paul J. Adam
• US Navy Strikes on Kapsan, christopher . pontrelli
• Cyclone-class Patrol Boat making a comeback., dumpster4
• Re: Depleted Uranium Ammunition, John Dallman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Depleted Uranium Ammunition, Jim Yanik
    • Re: Depleted Uranium Ammunition, Tank Fixer
• COMNAVSECGRU organization, late 2004, Allen Thomson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: COMNAVSECGRU organization, late 2004, scott s.
• "Dabtoes"?, Andrew Chaplin
  • Re: "Dabtoes"?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: "Dabtoes"?, BF Lake
  • Re: "Dabtoes"?, Tim McDermott
    • Re: "Dabtoes"?, Chris
• Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, John P. Mullen
    • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, TOliver
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, William Black
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jim Watt
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, TOliver
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jim Watt
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Jim Watt
    • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, Sarah H
      • Re: Former newspaper editor defamed on Wikipedia, John P. Mullen
• Re: Second TIME Magazine reporter asked to testify onCIAleakcase-- GOP: the war-profiteering American Treason Party controlledbytheBushCrime Family, Jack Linthicum
• Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Matt Wiser
  • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Vince Brannigan
    • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCESof, John P. Mullen
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCESof, Vince
      • Free Speech vs. just making noise, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince
      • Message not available
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, TOliver
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, TOliver
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Pete Granzeau
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Mark Test
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Matt Wiser
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Vince
      • Re: Free Speech vs. just making noise, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCESof, Matt Wiser
    • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Vince
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Matt Wiser
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Vince
    • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES of, Matt Wiser
  • Loyalty in wartime (was:Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES), Matt Wiser
    • Re: Loyalty in wartime, Vince
      • Re: Loyalty in wartime, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Loyalty in wartime, Vince
      • Re: Loyalty in wartime, Mark Test
      • Re: Loyalty in wartime, Matt Wiser
      • Re: Loyalty in wartime, Vince Brannigan
  • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Matt Wiser
    • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Vince
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Mark Test
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Matt Wiser
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Matt Wiser
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Matt Wiser
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Vince
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Matt Wiser
      • Re: 2,129 ADULTs (not 'boy' or 'kids') WHO SUFFERED the CONSEQUENCES, Matt Wiser
• Re: Officials: CIA Missile Strike Kills Al-Qaida No. 3, Jack Love
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Officials: CIA Missile Strike Kills Al-Qaida No. 3, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Officials: CIA Missile Strike Kills Al-Qaida No. 3, Jack Linthicum
• Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, PaPaPeng
  • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Mark Test
    • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Keith W
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, aminyard
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, aminyard
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, TOliver
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Keith W
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Alan Lothian
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, M. J. Powell
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Alan Lothian
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Peter Skelton
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Matt Wiser
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Andrew Venor
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Mark Test
  • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Andre Lieven
    • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, old hoodoo
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, Andre Lieven
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, old hoodoo
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, old hoodoo
      • Re: Kamikaze pilots and suicide bombers, dott.piergiorgio
• Re: _The Big Sleep_ [1946], Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: _The Big Sleep_ [1946], Jack Linthicum
  • Re: _The Big Sleep_ [1946], Jack Linthicum
• (Former) Field Station Sinop, Allen Thomson
  • Re: (Former) Field Station Sinop, Jack Linthicum
• Yes, the Military Needs Bodies. But Hold the Bodywork., Jack Linthicum
• USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Andrew C . Toppan
  • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Seawolf
    • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, CarpATM
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, CarpATM
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, BF Lake
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Mark Andrew Spence
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, CarpATM
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Mark Andrew Spence
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Andrew Venor
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Scott M. Kozel
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Jack Love
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Andrew Venor
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Jack Love
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Jack Love
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Jack Love
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, redc1c4
      • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Jack Love
    • Re: USS George Washington (CVN-73)'s reactor will be shut down in Japanese port, Errol Cavit
• FBI Is Taking Another Look at Forged Prewar Intelligence, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: FBI Is Taking Another Look at Forged Prewar Intelligence, CarpATM
• Inside the Ring, Andy Tompkins
• CHINA REPORTEDLY RECEIVED SHIP DATA HIDDEN IN MUSIC FILES, Andy Tompkins
• Re: White Phosphorus --, Matt Wiser
• Restless in Ramadi..., Ian MacLure
• Re: If Torture Is Such A Good Idea WHY IS BUSH LYING ABOUT IT?, Matt Wiser
• Coast Guard Offers Boating Course, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Thursday, December 01, 2005, Otis Willie
• Japan's Coast Guard Seeks 2/3rd Rise in Budget to Buy Boats, Otis Willie
• Filippines: Mayuga seen as next Navy chief, Otis Willie
• Midshipmen reflect on being part of wartime military, Otis Willie
• Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, mike
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, aminyard
    • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, William Black
    • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, M. J. Powell
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, Keith W
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, William Black
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, M. J. Powell
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, Keith W
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, William Black
      • Re: The Falklands/Malvinas War, Fred J . McCall
• For those in peril on the sea ..., William Hamblen
  • Re: For those in peril on the sea ..., William Vickrey
• Re: M80 Stiletto, dumpster4
  • Re: M80 Stiletto, Ken Adams
• Re: Who Is The Greatest Scottish Person In History?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Who Is The Greatest Scottish Person In History?, TOliver
    • Re: Who Is The Greatest Scottish Person In History?, William Black
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Who Is The Greatest Scottish Person In History?, Robert Peffers
  • Re: Who Is The Greatest Scottish Person In History?, Robert Peffers
• Is Bluebird K7 naval?, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Is Bluebird K7 naval?, William Black
• Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
  • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, John D Salt
    • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, John D Salt
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, John D Salt
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, John D Salt
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, John D Salt
      • Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says so by army report!!! WAS:Re: US forces 'used chemical weapons' at Fallujah, Admiral Sir Francis Haddock
• Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Gernot Hassenpflug
  • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Jack Love
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Gernot Hassenpflug
    • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, aminyard
      • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Gernot Hassenpflug
  • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Brad Meyer
  • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Brad Meyer
    • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Mike Weeks
      • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Mike Weeks
      • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Brad Meyer
      • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Brad Meyer
  • Re: IJN CAP at Midway: the fatal mistake?, Brad Meyer
• Re: email block, Gernot Hassenpflug
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: email block, Gernot Hassenpflug
• Re: HELL SURE is GETTING OVERCROWDED these DAYS !, Matt Wiser
• Re: THE GENOCIDE of U.S. OIL NAZIs (no WMDs yet, just plenty of oil fields), Matt Wiser
• Re: Reuters: Israelis training Kurds in northern Iraq, Matt Wiser
• Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Matt Wiser
  • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Mark Test
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Jack Linthicum
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Murtha Says Army Is 'Broken, Worn Out'-NOT, Matt Wiser
• Re: Master And Commander -- A View From The Left, waltbj01
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Master And Commander -- A View From The Left, waltbj01
    • Re: Master And Commander -- A View From The Left, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Master And Commander -- A View From The Left, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Master And Commander -- A View From The Left, William Hamblen
• Mossad, "single bullet theory", Laura
  • Re: Mossad, "single bullet theory", Laura
• Smoking on submarines, Mike
  • Re: Smoking on submarines, Felix Reuthner
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, old hoodoo
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, george
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Smoking on submarines, niceguy
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, JustMe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, george
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, george
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, george
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Alan Lothian
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, waltbj01
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Richard O'Keefe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Richard O'Keefe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, BlackBeard
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, David Loewe, Jr.
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, David Loewe, Jr.
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Andy Dingley
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Richard O'Keefe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Harry Bennett
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, JustMe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Vince Brannigan
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, JustMe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Derek Lyons
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Mark Borgerson
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, JustMe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, aminyard
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, JustMe
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Mark Borgerson
  • Re: Smoking on submarines, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, alumshubby
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, TOliver
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Mike
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, Richard O'Keefe
    • Re: Smoking on submarines, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Smoking on submarines, Jack Linthicum
• Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, Mike
  • Re: Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, Peter Skelton
  • Re: Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, John Mianowski
    • Re: Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, William Hughes
      • Re: Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, Mike
      • Re: Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, TOliver
    • Re: Foreign commander on U.S. Navy warship, John Dallman
• Re: Neocon Hijacked Bush regime was after Al Jazeera - Bamford on this Monday:, Fred J . McCall
• NavNews for Wednesday, November 30, 2005, Otis Willie
• President's Statement on HR 2528, the "Military Quality of Life, Otis Willie
• Re: Mrs. Miniver -- Greer Garson & Churchill, Robert Peffers
• Paid-For Iraq Stories Concern White House, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Paid-For Iraq Stories Concern White House, Jack Linthicum
• Israelis training Kurds in northern Iraq, Norwegians drilling for oil, Jack Linthicum
• Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Howard C. Berkowitz
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Jack Love
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Fred J . McCall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Jim Yanik
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Glenn Dowdy
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Kevin Brooks
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Paul J. Adam
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, aminyard
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Mark Bradford
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Paul J. Adam
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, kenney
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Keith W
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Michael P . Reed
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Kevin Brooks
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Michael P . Reed
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, kenney
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Michael P . Reed
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, kenney
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Jim
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Eystein Roll Aarseth
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, John D Salt
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, William Hamblen
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, John D Salt
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, John D Salt
  • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Andre Lieven
    • Re: What Colin Campbell Always Wanted to Know About Tanks, Keith W
• "First post-9/11 naval class ready to serve", Mike
• Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Andy Tompkins
  • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Henry J Cobb
    • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Henry J Cobb
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Henry J Cobb
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Henry J Cobb
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, John Dallman
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Chinese build a high-tech army within an army, dott.piergiorgio
• US more cautious than wary as China's reach grows, Andy Tompkins
  • Re: US more cautious than wary as China's reach grows, Henry J Cobb
• Japan LDP's draft militarist Constitution, Andy Tompkins
• Mini-sub Takes a Dive, Andy Tompkins
• Guam to be hub for spy planes, Andy Tompkins
• Re: Second TIME Magazine reporter asked to testify on CIAleakcase-- GOP: the war-profiteering American Treason Party controlled bytheBushCrime Family, Jack Linthicum
• Re: The truth is out. It's TRUE-- US used chemical weapons says, Fred J . McCall
• Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Peter McLelland
    • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Keith W
      • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Keith W
      • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Nicholas Smid
    • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Kevin Brooks
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, William Black
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Peter McLelland
  • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, Peter McLelland
    • Re: Tactics in Late WWI, TOliver
• Re: George Soros' Little Secret (Moveon.org) - He Doesn't Pay Taxes But Wants Everyone Else To, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: George Soros' Little Secret (Moveon.org) - He Doesn't Pay Taxes But Wants Everyone Else To, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Midshipmen wait for President's speech at the Naval Academy, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Midshipmen wait for President's speech at the Naval Academy, scott s.
  • Re: Midshipmen wait for President's speech at the Naval Academy, Mark Test
• Deep-Water Currents Slowing, a real naval topic, Jack Linthicum
• Re: How did USS Dolphin swamp?, Duke of URL
  • Re: How did USS Dolphin swamp?, Bob McKellar
  • Re: How did USS Dolphin swamp?, Thomas Schoene
    • Re: How did USS Dolphin swamp?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: How did USS Dolphin swamp?, Duke of URL
• Re: Bush-Lies-Regime Inner Circle, Matt Wiser
• Re:Moronic behaviour in the "The Falklands/Malvinas War" thread, Ron Larham
• Re: Second TIME Magazine reporter asked to testify on CIA leak case -- GOP: the war-profiteering American Treason Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, leadfoot
  • Re: Second TIME Magazine reporter asked to testify on CIA leak case -- GOP: the war-profiteering American Treason Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Second TIME Magazine reporter asked to testify on CIA leak case -- GOP: the war-profiteering American Treason Party controlled by the Bush Crime Family, John P. Mullen
• USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
  • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, dontcowerfromthetruth
  • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
  • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
    • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
    • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
    • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
      • Re: USS Liberty Murders by Israel to crush Senator John McCain Candidacy for President before he even announces formally---An Open Letter to the Good Senator, montgomery_scott2001
• Linguistic question, dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Linguistic question, Thomas Schoene
    • Re: Linguistic question, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Linguistic question, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Linguistic question, Vince
      • Re: Linguistic question, Taki Kogoma
      • Re: Linguistic question, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Linguistic question, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Linguistic question, redc1c4
  • Re: Linguistic question, Ian MacLure
    • Re: Linguistic question, Sarah H
      • Re: Linguistic question, Vince
      • Re: Linguistic question, CJ Adams
      • Re: Linguistic question, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Linguistic question, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: Linguistic question, Tim Jordan
      • Re: Linguistic question, Sarah Hotdesking
      • Re: Linguistic question, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Linguistic question, dott.piergiorgio
    • Re: Linguistic question, bw
    • Re: Linguistic question, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Linguistic question, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Linguistic question, Jim McLaughlin
      • Re: Linguistic question, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Linguistic question, Brian Sharrock
      • Re: Linguistic question, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Linguistic question, TOliver
      • Re: Linguistic question, Arved Sandstrom
      • Re: Linguistic question, Andrew Chaplin
      • Re: Linguistic question, redc1c4
      • Re: Linguistic question, Jack Linthicum
      • Re: Linguistic question, ibm@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Linguistic question, Jack Love
      • Re: Linguistic question, Andy Dingley
      • Re: Linguistic question, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Linguistic question, Jack Linthicum
• MoveOn (George Soros and Co) forge Brits into Yanks., Jack Love
  • Re: MoveOn (George Soros and Co) forge Brits into Yanks., Komin
    • Re: MoveOn (George Soros and Co) forge Brits into Yanks., redc1c4
• Standard Federal ID to Replace Common Access Cards, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Tuesday, November 29, 2005, Otis Willie
• NavNews for Monday, November 28, 2005, Otis Willie
• Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, Mike Weeks
  • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, montgomery_scott2001
  • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, scott s.
    • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, aminyard
      • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, Mike Weeks
    • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, Mike Weeks
      • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, montgomery_scott2001
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, Mike Weeks
    • Re: Article 712, Navy Regulations 1920, montgomery_scott2001
• Re: Immediate American Withdrawal From Iraq Is A Bum Idea, Jack Linthicum
• Re: Best Combat Pistols, Jack Linthicum
  • Re: Best Combat Pistols, Andrew Chaplin
    • Re: Best Combat Pistols, Jack Linthicum
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best Combat Pistols, aminyard
    • Re: Best Combat Pistols, Peter Kemp
      • Re: Best Combat Pistols, scott s.
  • Re: Best Combat Pistols, Jack Linthicum
    • Re: Best Combat Pistols, William Black
• Re: What does it say about the president of the United States that he won't go anywhere near ordinary citizens any more? -- Bush's Cocaine Addiction Blamed As Reason For His Insanity???, Jack Linthicum
• USS Tang incident - or "Are those high-speed screws I hear?", kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: USS Tang incident - or "Are those high-speed screws I hear?", Andrew J Farrow
  • Re: USS Tang incident - or "Are those high-speed screws I hear?", John Dallman
  • Re: USS Tang incident - or "Are those high-speed screws I hear?", John Szalay
• Re: history channel again., kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: history channel again., Mike Weeks
    • Re: history channel again., kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: history channel again., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: history channel again., Mike Weeks
      • Re: history channel again., William Black
      • Re: history channel again., Vince
      • Re: history channel again., Mike Weeks
      • Re: history channel again., dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: history channel again., John Mianowski
      • Re: history channel again., kenney
      • Re: history channel again., Pete Granzeau
      • Re: history channel again., Matt Wiser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: history channel again., dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: history channel again., Jack Linthicum
    • Re: history channel again., Mike Weeks
      • Re: history channel again., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: history channel again., Mike Weeks
      • Re: history channel again., montgomery_scott2001
    • Re: history channel again., Drazen Kramaric
      • Re: history channel again., Thomas Schoene
      • Re: history channel again., John P. Mullen
      • Re: history channel again., kingfish@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: history channel again., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: history channel again., Pete Granzeau
      • Re: history channel again., aminyard
      • Re: history channel again., Brad Meyer
      • Re: history channel again., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: history channel again., old hoodoo
      • Re: history channel again., Drazen Kramaric
      • Re: history channel again., Jack Linthicum
      • Re: history channel again., Drazen Kramaric
  • Re: history channel again., Pete Granzeau
• Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Henry J Cobb
  • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Mark Bradford
    • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Henry J Cobb
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Keith W
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, aminyard
  • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, John P. Mullen
    • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Mark Bradford
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Henry J Cobb
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, dott.piergiorgio
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, John P. Mullen
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Thomas Schoene
      • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, dott.piergiorgio
  • Re: Possible Future States of the US Navy, Fred J . McCall
• Contractor passed info to China since 1983 on DDC, EMALS, AEGIS, MARF, etc, Mike
• Re: Plame Flames, Jack Linthicum
• Dreadnought Gunnery at the Battle of Jutland: The Question of Fire Control, john_redman
  • Re: Dreadnought Gunnery at the Battle of Jutland: The Question of Fire Control, John Dallman
  • Re: Dreadnought Gunnery at the Battle of Jutland: The Question of Fire Control, Ian MacLure