Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: "dott.piergiorgio" <dott.piergiorgioHIRYU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:25:09 +0100
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:21:33 +0000, Thomas Schoene wrote:
> You'd see RFNA as the oxidizer in a liquid-fueled rocket motor. However,
> Talos was an air-breathing ramjet, so it only needed a fuel. Hydrocarbons
> like kerosene are relatively safe for this and have excellent energy
> density.
OK thanks for the correction and explanations !
Best regards from Italy,
Dott. Piergiorgio.
.
- References:
- How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: alumshubby
- Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: ray o'hara
- Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: dott.piergiorgio
- Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: dott.piergiorgio
- Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- From: Thomas Schoene
- How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- Prev by Date: Re: Return of the Samurai!
- Next by Date: Re: B* things roars...
- Previous by thread: Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- Next by thread: Re: How top-heavy were the Albanys?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|