Re: India's Nuclear Arms


Jim Yanik (jyanik@xxxxxxxxx) writes:
> dg411@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Andre Lieven) wrote in
> news:djoshi$cbr$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> "Dean A. Markley" (deanmarkley@xxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
>
>>> To be fair, South Africa had them and then gave them up. Also, you
>>> forgot Germany and Japan during WWII...
>>
>> Not at all, as they never got close to a Bomb.
>>
>> Andre
>
> Only because the Allies did not give them enough time to develop them.

All the documents and reports on both Axis nations' efforts in this
area said that they were years away from anything, especially the
Japanese.

> We bombed the crap out of them.

And, if the Allies hadn't... no difference.

> Unlike present times, where we leave them alone until they do make
> them despite being signatories to the non-proliferation agreements.

You mean, like Israel ? <g>

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: me@privacy.net has no answer
    ... Andre wrote: ... To cynic living in South Africa, was he deported from there to the UK ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: South Africa
    ... Andre wrote: ... in South Africa? ... Had a nice nap? ... Maybe they can held it in Zimbabwe ....there is it the other way ...
    (rec.sport.soccer)