Re: Back to the V-22 turkey
- From: "Thomas Schoene" <taschoene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:20:24 GMT
Vince Brannigan wrote:
>
> The CSAR and Special operations requirements are simply not relevant
> to the Marine mission.
Except that these profiles are almost exactly the same profile that the
marines actually plan to execute in OMFTS. And they aren't exactly new,
similar profiles have been part of MEU(SOC) misison requirements for years
(for special ops read amphibious raid; for CSAR, read TRAP, but the mission
profiles are very similar)
>
> I'm also still waiting for any proof that the Osprey has carried slung
> military cargo in horizontal flight at full speed
And you never will, because sling loads aren't carried at maximum speed.
This isn't unique to Osprey; in helos you're lucky to manage 60 knots with a
sling load.
--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when
wrong to be put right." - Senator Carl Schurz, 1872
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back to the V-22 turkey
- From: Vince
- Re: Back to the V-22 turkey
- References:
- Re: Bush nominates white house crony to Supreme Court
- From: Mark Test
- Re: Bush nominates white house crony to Supreme Court
- From: Vince Brannigan
- Re: Bush nominates white house crony to Supreme Court
- From: Kevin Brooks
- Re: Bush nominates white house crony to Supreme Court
- From: Vince Brannigan
- Back to the V-22 turkey
- From: Vince Brannigan
- Re: Bush nominates white house crony to Supreme Court
- Prev by Date: Re: Hillary Rodham At Wellesley College
- Next by Date: Re: Oil dispute troubles waters between China and Japan
- Previous by thread: Re: Back to the V-22 turkey
- Next by thread: Re: Back to the V-22 turkey
- Index(es):