Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: "BF Lake" <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:24:29 GMT
"Peter Skelton" <skeltonp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gblri1plaik35a17p0bcke6stptrevti2c@xxxxxxxxxx
> >BTW I suspect that Skelton is related to "our" Peter, due to the
Kingston
> >connection, but I don't know.
> >
> Not back to the great-grandfather anyway.
No Skeltons in the closet?
Regards,
Barry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: Peter Skelton
- Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- References:
- Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: Doug
- Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: BF Lake
- Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: Andrew Chaplin
- Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: BF Lake
- Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- From: Peter Skelton
- Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- Prev by Date: Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- Next by Date: Re: Save the battleships - USS Iowa and USS Wisconsin
- Previous by thread: Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- Next by thread: Re: Prince of Wales and Repulse: who was responsible?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|