Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: azb@xxxxxxxxxx (Andrew Robert Breen)
- Date: 17 Aug 2005 09:21:20 +0100
In article <4302da1f$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Peter McLelland <peter.mclelland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
><kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:l-SdnTcz9f9At5_eRVnyvA@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In article <4301f00c$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> peter.mclelland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter McLelland) wrote:
>>
>> > It is unlikely that the engine manufacturers were ever asked to
>> > guarantee speed, that was the responsibility of the design
>>
>> True, but destroyer manufacturers were, and they supplied the
>> machinery as well. While I am here, does anybody want more from this
>> book?
>>
>The design and build contracts that were common for TBDs etc are a different
>situation from the one described in the book, and as I think none of the
>yards building small ships and any engine building capability I suspect they
>used similar contracting methods to obtain the engines and boilers for their
>design.
Later period, too. ISTR from somewhere that bonus/penalties for trials
performance came in somewhere towards the back end of the 1880s..
>
>ps yes to more form the book.
AOL that.
--
Andy Breen ~ Not speaking on behalf of the University of Wales, Aberystwyth
Feng Shui: an ancient oriental art for extracting
money from the gullible (Martin Sinclair)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: Peter McLelland
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- References:
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: Peter McLelland
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: kenney
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: Peter McLelland
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- Prev by Date: Re: Ignorance Of The Canadian Public On Military Matters
- Next by Date: A novel form of warship construction
- Previous by thread: Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- Next by thread: Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|