Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: "Peter McLelland" <peter.mclelland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:42:00 +0100
<kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l-SdnTcz9f9At5_eRVnyvA@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <4301f00c$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> peter.mclelland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter McLelland) wrote:
>
> > It is unlikely that the engine manufacturers were ever asked to
> > guarantee speed, that was the responsibility of the design
>
> True, but destroyer manufacturers were, and they supplied the
> machinery as well. While I am here, does anybody want more from this
> book?
>
The design and build contracts that were common for TBDs etc are a different
situation from the one described in the book, and as I think none of the
yards building small ships and any engine building capability I suspect they
used similar contracting methods to obtain the engines and boilers for their
design.
Peter
ps yes to more form the book.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: kenney
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: Andrew Robert Breen
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- References:
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: Peter McLelland
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- From: kenney
- Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- Prev by Date: Re: bungled shooting of Brazilian
- Next by Date: Re: Two US-Built Destroyers to Join Taiwan Navy
- Previous by thread: Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- Next by thread: Re: RN machinery supply 1880
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|