Re: A Question for Otis and Lelouch

On Aug 8, 11:48 pm, vistrainer <deak...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Now, some people on this forum may question whether or not I am
commercially motivated. ***I am not***. My business is not substantial
enough to support me. In fact, I lose money every month

Oh. Okay, Fred. You are NOT commercially motivated.

But you DO sell a product that's PREMISED on you and others believing
that it might work.

The fact that you are, it would seem, a lousy businessman doesn't
alter the FACT that you DO have a financial interest in this entire
issue.

So sorry.


As I said before, I have no agenda on this forum.

Other than the above: you sell a product that is premised on a theory
for which there is ZERO evidence.

Do YOU HAVE any evidence that your $40 product works any better than
placebo at improving vision?

Just like Otis, you never produce any.

Odd, huh?


I really feel that petty criticism has no place here,

Yet, you lead with it.

Hmmm.

which is why I
think that Neil Brooks serves no purpose on this form but to distract.

Actually, it's to deal in facts, logic, and honesty.

You should try it some time.


Even John Sheridan told him to shut up,

"Even John Sheridan?"

"EVEN JOHN SHERIDAN??"

Well ... when you've been asked to shut up by John Sheridan, then
you've certainly been asked by the best.

You're an idiot, Fred -- just like Otis.

if that gives you any
indication as to who is here to learn and who is here with a hidden
agenda.

I'm here to learn, and to teach where I can.

You have an economic interest.

Maybe repeating your position ad nauseum will make YOU think it's
true, but ... it still won't be.

Anyway, Jan, I thank you for your posts and questions. I hope that we,
too, can be on cordial terms.

Cordial is way overrated.

Evidence, on the other hand, is valuable.

Got any, Fred??

If so, then ... it boggles the mind that you (and Otis) won't present
it.

Hmmmmm.
.

Relevant Pages
Loading