Re: Welcome to sci.med.vision (3/31)

Thank you for participating in our unmoderated open forum.

YOUR?

YOU own this group?

Really?

Or just trying to put yourself in position of authority?

The readers of this group should think for themselves instead of
listening to a post which sounds very professional and authorititive
but actually, it's dumb!

The Bates method is not 'too good to be true'. It is just a sad and
deplorable situation in which we have the majority that are very
stubborn and inert people who do not want to try out something new and
get a cure. The "authority" (you) makes statements that look very big
and mature but you yourself never even tried the cure of imperfect
sight. Now this authority goes unquestioned by the weak and the
guallables who come to this group. So the sequence continues onwards,
for many years. No one questions, no one tries, no one gets any good
progress.

This is why we do not have yet the real proof of Bates' method
efficacy. To the eye doctors and vision researchers this is what I
have to say: You as the professionals, ought to be putting in all the
efforts to test out new methods. Who am I? Just a little kid who is
still in secondary school! I have no knowledge of the ocular anatomy,
no knowledge of anything in the Eyecare world! It's just me,
completely unprofessional, am learning the cure of imperfect sight!
And getting real results! Without hardly ANY knowledge of its
physiology!

And yet you, as professionals in your own field, unable to give any
real cures to your patients, just give them glasses or cut their
cornea and condemn them to their reliances for the rest of their life!
Surely you should have the greatest motivation for the task of
producing trials and whatnot.

Imagine what you could do, with your power!

We call to you, urge you in this time of greatest need, to direct your
efforts into understanding the cure of imperfect sight! The suffering
of the poor and the weak should end here! The iatrogenic era has been
unnecesarily endured, unquestioningly, for too long

If you try the rest methods first, then write this post saying 'it
doesn't work' then that is slightly more acceptable. But you did not
even try! Not even a little bit! You show not even the SLIGHTEST bit
of curiosity or interest.

You just continue to mock and ridicule a treatment without having any,
not even a small wisp, of understanding on the subject.

Is this scientific, I ask.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Welcome to sci.med.vision (3/31)
    ... professional OR authoritative, AND are actually dumb, so ... ... The "authority" makes statements that look very big ... and mature but you yourself never even tried the cure of imperfect ... You as the professionals, ought to be putting in all the ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Ken "fucking" Livingstone
    ... tell him that in a country that is roughly 92% white there is a very ... No doubt there are suitable professionals ... and Emergency Planning Authority' sounds like a heavy responsibility. ... What would make anyone assume that the Labour nominations would be any "better"? ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)