Re: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- From: callimico66@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:40:25 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 22, 6:10 pm, ljvoi...@xxxxxxx wrote:
I was thinking of Varilux
1.67 Panamic, Ellipse or Physio and not sure which would be best
with less distortion for my vision or can you recommend another.
Thank You for the help.... Linda
I have had progressives in 1.67 in both Panamic and Physio 360--and I
prefer the Physio---my current glasses. Frame shape and size makes a
difference---the "short" frames that are so popular sometimes don't
turn out all that well in a progressive (if the vertical dimension
isn't tall enough there's not much room for the +add).
Not sure what you mean by "doubling up" on your glasses....
C
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- From: Dan Abel
- Re: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- From: ljvoight
- Re: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- References:
- Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- From: ljvoight
- Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- Prev by Date: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- Next by Date: VISION Benefits $19.95/mo WHOLE HOUSEHOLD
- Previous by thread: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- Next by thread: Re: Progressive or bi-focal glasses with very poor vision
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
