Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Robert Martellaro <robopt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:15:53 -0500
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:33:25 -0500, "Barrie Wilson" <bwilson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what I'm talking about is (very) roughly akin to a camera's
AutoFocus capabilities .. without the mechanical elements, which would be
unwieldy at best ... not knowing enough about optics, nanotechnology, light
valves, molecular array manipulation, optoelectronics, or even ordinary
materials technology, how you would dynamically alter refractive power I
haven't a clue ... it may all be sci-fi ... and it may not.
Not.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/103/16/6100
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
Wauwatosa Wi.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- References:
- Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Mike Tyner
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Mike Tyner
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: MsBrainy via MedKB.com
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Simple Prescription Question
- Prev by Date: Spasmus Nutans
- Next by Date: Re: myopia and eye strain at near
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple Prescription Question
- Next by thread: Re: Simple Prescription Question
- Index(es):