Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: lena102938 <db00qp00@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:04:51 -0700
On Sep 27, 9:03 pm, "MsBrainy via MedKB.com" <u33689@uwe> wrote:
Barrie Wilson wrote:
ok ... now I think I get it; even knowing better, I haven't really been
properly accounting for the difference in distance from reading material I
typically experience ... do people really consistently read stuff at 16" ??
well, guess you have settle in on something or the other .. unless you want
to keep a variety of glasses around
what we need is auto-zoom lenses ... maybe one of these days nanotechnology
will give us microprocessors embedded in lenses; AI will figure out the
focal distance and trigger changes in refractive power something along the
lines of "Transitions" changing the level of tint ... not in my lifetime I
would not think ... we'll probably just fix the eye
itself instead ...
These have already been invented. They are called progressives. From my
experience they work. Although my Rx is different than yours, I recommend
Zeiss PAL, unless the ODs around here think that it won't be proper for your
prescription.
--
MsBrainy
Message posted viahttp://www.medkb.com
Mrs Brainy, do not worry, His prescription assumes progressives.
.
- References:
- Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Mike Tyner
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Mike Tyner
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: Barrie Wilson
- Re: Simple Prescription Question
- From: MsBrainy via MedKB.com
- Simple Prescription Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Preventing myopia in children with OrthoK? Proven or nonsense?
- Next by Date: Re: Science: Depth of Field for the Primate Eye
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple Prescription Question
- Next by thread: Re: Simple Prescription Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|