Re: School Children's Eyes
- From: p.clarkii@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:36:40 -0000
On Sep 26, 12:09 pm, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well it is proven but you have to search it:
New York Medical Journal, July 29, 1911, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 237-238
that is not proof. that is simply a report in an old journal that
contains no controls or has no statistical analysis. do a google
search on "evidence-based medicine".
your understanding of what constitutes proof, and what is actually
scientific observation versus someones opinion and interpretation, is
sorely lacking.
you said you came to this newsgroup to learn, but instead you came
here under false pretenses using false names. you are Rishi who is an
idiotic Italian troll who tries to make money off of people by selling
them books and giving them false unproven information. you are a con-
man.
.
- References:
- School Children's Eyes
- From: Zetsu
- Re: School Children's Eyes
- From: Mike Tyner
- Re: School Children's Eyes
- From: Zetsu
- Re: School Children's Eyes
- From: Zetsu
- School Children's Eyes
- Prev by Date: Re: Progressive Lenses
- Next by Date: Re: School Children's Eyes
- Previous by thread: Re: School Children's Eyes
- Next by thread: Lasik surgery and acoustic neuroma
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|