Re: Why not visit alt.med.vision.improve ?


Dear "L",

Subject: Some clarifications.

It is profoundly easy to quick-fix a person (after he has
INDUCED a negative refractive STATE in his eyes).

It is profoundly SIMPLE to do that.

I have no doubt (because of the PROVEN effect
of a -3 diopter lens on the eye), that the refractive
STATE of the fundamental eye FOLLOWS the
AVERAGE value of accommodation.
But of course you choose to understand NONE
of this.

So to reply:

Yes. Just think of all those people who never went on to accomplish
anything in their poor useless lives because they were forced to wear
eyeglasses.

Here this loud and clear. No once is "forced" to wear
minus glasses. But the minus is often profoudly
over-prescribed. A person with verified 20/40 vision
will receive a -2 diopter lens -- and be told to
"wear it all the time", 16/7.

A young child with 20/60 vision, is PRESCRIBED a
-11 diopter lens (WOW), and the mother is led
to BELIEVE that the child should be FORCED
to wear that -11 diopter lens -- all the time.

Given the PROVEN effect of a -3 diopter lens on
the eye, I think that is a disaster for that young child.

DrL> Otis, where are you?

Otis> Where am I. I think that child's refractive STATE
will indeed go down very rapidly.

Otis> I think she should have been informed of the
PROVEN effect of a -3 diopter lens on the eye -- before
that child was put into a -11 diopter lens.

Otis> But that would have been a matter of RESPECTING
the mothers RIGHT to an informed choice in this
matter.

Otis> In its essence, I think that was Bate's position
on that wretched minus lens.


Otis





On Aug 31, 8:16 am, "Dr. Leukoma" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 31, 5:40 am, Zetsu <absolutelyinvinci...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

y r u so annoyed if i am lookin for an intelligent debate

why so much fear?

ur just scared coz ur crappy & false theories will go to hell, as will
ur sick distructiv profession of optometry

the real sick man iz u. u just like destroyin peoplez lives givin em
stupid glassses and these other crap. y dnt u learn a thing or two
from dr.bates... u might actually understand some useful stuff mate...
if thats evn possible for a dweeb of ur nature

Yes. Just think of all those people who never went on to accomplish
anything in their poor useless lives because they were forced to wear
eyeglasses. Otis, where are you?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OTIS LIES AND BLAMES HIS DOCTOR AGAIN
    ... Otis> No, Mike, I NEVER said that. ... I know what the majority-opinion ... ODs beleive (that a -3 diopter lens has NO EFFECT on the natural eye's ... nay LEAP to your false conclusion (that the eye is not ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: My sister is ruining her eyes and inducing more myopia!
    ... Otis> I asked a question that has an answer in MEASURED ... ASSUMING that the natural eye is NOT A SOPHISTIACTED ... REFRACTIVE STATE -- and the visual enviroment ... a -3 diopter lens) versus your concept ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: A Question for Otis and Lelouch
    ... Otis> You mean that the concept that a population of fundamental eyes ... Otis> Evidence that the natural eye does NOT change its refractive ... diopter lens in front of the eye. ... what kind of evidence would you accept that would make ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
    ... Tyner> "Otis believe something even more fantabulous. ... you place a -3 diopter lens on it. ... Otis> You believe that the natural eye is NOT A DYNAMIC SYSTEM, ... find different rates of myopia between those who wear glasses, ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Converting "Script" to pure Spherical Equivalent
    ... "For my young patients with simple myopia, ... refractive STATE of the fundamental eye. ... solutions that are going to be the most benifetial to the patient? ... Otis Brown, engineer. ...
    (sci.med.vision)