Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??

X-No-Archive:

Subject: The reason Alex set up i-see.

Alex had a long-running argument with Dr. David B. Granet,
a majority-opinion optometrist.

Alex DID NOT AGREE with Granet's thesis that nearsighteness
COULD NOT BE PREVENTED.

All that is fine, since sci.med.vision is a majority-opinion
site.

Since then you have taken up Granet's "cause", and
post on sci.med.vision.

That is fine also. But when you FOLLOW Alex onto
HIS SECOND-OPINION SITE, you can expect your commentary to get
a complete review it never received on sci.med.vision.

And now you cry about it.

Otis

[Post send to Alex for his review.]



On Jul 29, 12:49 pm, Neil Brooks <neil0...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:23:44 -0700, Dr Judy <mpac...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Neil, sorry to gripe but....

Posting copies of posts to other forums and of private e-mails drops
you to the level of Otis.

While I concede that the posting of a private e-mail may not be
considered appropriate, snipping and running to a PRIVATE, AND
MODERATED forum--where nobody can respond--is quite different, IMO
from copying a publicly-pasted post to a public, unmoderated forum
where others CAN weigh in.

It isn't useful, encourages more Otis
trolling and adds to the noise here.

1) If anybody from Alex's forum visits s.m.v., then I'd like them to
know that Alex blocks the addition of valid clinical studies from HIS
group in the same way that Otis blocks them from HIS.

So, as always, it may not be useful to YOU, but ....

2) In my years of experience, Otis needs no encouragement, nor is it
possible to discourage his posting. Nothing that anybody has ever
DONE, or refrained FROM doing has had any effect on his posting
frequency. Check the record.

BTW, Alex is not Otis, he also actively blocks Otis posts to his forum
and, I think, has been keeping Otis in check there.

If, by "keeping Otis in check," you mean filtering out such things as
unverifiable, third-hand anecdotes, misquotes, misinterpretations of
studies, and lies of ommission, then I respectfully disagree.



Dr Judy- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mission Impossible
    ... method to alter "Otis bad" is not correctly seen. ... Alex but you wanted no part of that. ... Life with a myope is not easy though. ... You as a hyperope tend to not want to offend ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Neil David Brooks recommends using the plus.
    ... DO choose to fight the fights I can win. ... Alex is unquestionably more reasonable than Otis. ... however I dont see it as an entirely lost cause. ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Alex Eulenberg - DNA match for Otis??
    ... David B. Granet is an ophthalmologist, ... The reason Alex set up i-see. ... group in the same way that Otis blocks them from HIS. ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: OT: jb is an idiot
    ... What I recall as convincing was some argument regarding your spelling, ... jb seemed to be worrying about falling behind in posting ... You are the one that advanced the theory malf = Alex based on the misspelling of "thief". ... Brent Locher, alias BigDuck, also uses this spelling. ...
    (rec.games.go)
  • Re: outlook log in problem
    ... "Alex Yu" wrote: ... > outgoing mail server. ... > This posting represents my own opinion, ... > Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. ...
    (microsoft.public.outlook)