Re: Why incompetent bifocal studies fail.

On Jul 27, 11:21 pm, "otisbr...@xxxxxx" <otisbr...@xxxxxx> wrote:
When the study is done CORRECTLY (i.e., the Oakley-Young)
study, the minus group goes DOWN at a rate of -1/2 diopter per
year. The plus group does not go down. The data was
collected over four years.

really? so if the results don't come out the way you believe they
should then the study is done incorrectly?
well I bet there has been a half-dozen bifocal studies and ALL of them
except for the one you believe show that bifocal use has no or
negligible effects on myopia progression. but I guess they ALL are
wrong huh?

what about Chung's study on myopia undercorrection-- that's wrong too?

and what about Goss et al.'s study on overminusing children -- that's
wrong too?

and what about the studies where myopes take off their glasses to
read, and where plus readers are used, etc. etc. I suppose according
to you they are ALL done wrong.

I guess when a study is performed that reaches a different conclusion
than you believe it should, then the study is wrong-- right?

You sure are a critical thinker aren't you Otis. Your objectivity is
overwhelming. What a scientific mind you have!




.