Re: Bates method 'clear flashes' and neuroplasticity

On Mar 12, 12:41 am, "Mark Forum" <swimcham...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 12, 12:08 am, "Mark Forum" <swimcham...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 9, 4:03 pm, "Neil Brooks" <neil0...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jumping in with some related and some unrelated blurbs here.
1) As I mentioned/warned: you walked into a group that has--over
YEARS--been populated by bright, thoughtful, compassionate, well-
meaning doctors who have helped, collectively, probably tens of
thousands of people.

Most have good intentions and are caring, compassionate individuals
towards patients... that I agree with 100%...

Neil, thank you for trying not to engage in hostile attacks with me.
Unfortunately, the childish charade thrown by Dr. Leukoma and others
revealing their unprofessionalism and uncooperativeness towards
individuals such as myself who are trying to hold a genuine discussion
(imagine me as one of your own patients), because they treat me as
part of a collective (Bates), rather than an individual--has convinced
me this must be posted here immediately. Their professionalism should
extend even to unmoderated forums like this. Such unprofessionalism
only encourages the truly determined to stick around longer--and
discourages the weak to go away. Reverse psychology. You only
encourage the hardcores to work harder and stick around longer if you
use ad hominems. Fatal tactic.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22articles+in+medical+journals+are+scientifically+sound%22&btnG=Search

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/drhazar.htm

I'm done here. Best luck in your future pursuits. Yes... scientists
like statistics, but these statistics are not what scientists want to
hear. They pertain to major universities and studies across the world,
bridging the time gap for hundreds of years. i.e. "Any improvement in
life expectancy which has occurred in the last hundred years is not
related to developments in the medical profession or to the growth of
the international drug industry; but the increase in iatrogenesis
[diseases caused by treatment] is related to both these factors."
****VISITORS, IMMEDIATE ATTENTION: CLICK ON THE ABOVE LINKS****

Stay out of trouble folks. Choose a less dangerous religion than
"modern medicine is scientific." It is barely even scientific, as the
British Medical Journal has shown through a published study.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bates method clear flashes and neuroplasticity
    ... Most have good intentions and are caring, compassionate individuals ... revealing their unprofessionalism and uncooperativeness towards ... Scientists like statistics, but these statistics ...
    (sci.med.vision)
  • Re: Psychological impacts on students of harmful animal use
    ... >> That the most compassionate and ethical students are also those most ... > Michael Saunby ... surely "anyone" who thinks doctors and scientists should ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: More hockey stick hokum from Weiner and Chung
    ... of the "global warming" community in general. ... "scientists" like Weiner and Chung to prove their case to me, ... That's not what happens in the climate sciences. ... But Mann's "special statistics" are the main feature of the latest ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: Finding Mona
    ... perversely claimed that scientists wouldn't be interested in statistical ... Keep in mind that I didn't actually *know* how well Finding Mona would ... The techniques I listed included statistics. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Finding Mona
    ... perversely claimed that scientists wouldn't be interested in statistical ... not require tuning for specific structures in order to find anomalies. ... Mona is the simplest possible test, ... The techniques I listed included statistics. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading