Re: Bates method 'clear flashes' and neuroplasticity

On Mar 12, 12:08 am, "Mark Forum" <swimcham...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 9, 4:03 pm, "Neil Brooks" <neil0...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jumping in with some related and some unrelated blurbs here.

1) As I mentioned/warned: you walked into a group that has--over
YEARS--been populated by bright, thoughtful, compassionate, well-
meaning doctors who have helped, collectively, probably tens of
thousands of people.

Most have good intentions and are caring, compassionate individuals
towards patients... that I have absolutely no doubt of...

Neil, thank you for trying not to engage in hostile attacks with me.
Unfortunately, the childish charade thrown by Dr. Leukoma and others
revealing their unprofessionalism and uncooperativeness towards
individuals such as myself who are trying to hold a genuine discussion
(imagine me as one of your own patients), because they treat me as
part of a collective (Bates), rather than an individual--has convinced
me this must be posted here immediately. Their professionalism should
extend even to unmoderated forums like this. Such unprofessionalism
only encourages the truly determined to stick around longer--and
discourages the weak to go away. Reverse psychology. You only
encourage the hardcores to work harder and stick around longer if you
use ad hominems. Fatal tactic.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22articles+in+medical+journals+are+scientifically+sound%22&btnG=Search
http://www.vernoncoleman.com/drhazar.htm

I'm finished here. Best luck in your future pursuits. VISITORS, CLICK
ON THE ABOVE LINKS... Scientists like statistics, but these statistics
are not what scientists want to hear. They pertain to major
universities and studies across the world, bridging the time gap for
hundreds of years.

Stay out of trouble folks. Choose a less dangerous religion than
"modern medicine is scientific." And live long and prosper.

.

Relevant Pages
Loading