Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- From: "otisbrown@xxxxxx" <otisbrown@xxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Jul 2006 18:01:51 -0700
Dear AceMan,
Raphaeson GOT IT RIGHT!!!
But the father of "The Printer's Son" GOT IT WRONG.
That is not a conspiricy -- that is just simple, and tragic
ignorance.
That father put the KeyBaush on effective plus-prevention
for his child.
As long as the "public" thinks and behaves that way -- plus
prevention is indeed IMPOSSIBLE.
But now you know.
If you wish plus-prevention for your kids -- then you
are going to have to take that kind of responsibility.
And figure out how ot deal with the "Retinula" and
other arrogant and ignorant M.O. ODs.
Your knowledge of them and their "attitude" can
make all the difference. In short -- you can not
trust them (except for the "medical" part of a
check.)
Their belief that you can not PREVENT the development
of a negative refractive STATE for the natural eye -- is
false science.
But as always -- this iissue will only develop
10 to 15 years from now -- with your own
children.
Just remember their ARE SOME EXCELLENT S.O. OD
TO HELP. But you must make the crucial PREVENTIVE
choice for your kids.
Best,
Otis
acemanvx@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
otisbrown@xxxxxx smiled:
Dear AceMan,They just dont believe in it. Ultimately, only you can take care of
DrL> LOL
The Majority-opinion considers you protecting your
child's distant vision (as the engineer did it) a BIG JOKE.
your eyes. No one can take your responsability, you have to do it
yourself.
The Second-opinion OD takes plus-prevention VERY SERIOUSLY,Great guy!
as per Steve Leung OD at:
www.chinamyopia.org
So, before you do anything (with your child reading the 20/50 line),Dont worry if he doesnt believe in vision improvement, just do it
determine if you OD considers your right to an informed,
second-opinion a BIG JOKE.
yourself and if done correctly and consistly, results are rewarding.
Because a strong minus at 20/50 leads to stair-case myopiaI know, it happened to me and everyone else who went with the wretched
and PERMANENT consequences which then, can not
be reversed.
minus.
That is truly a choice that has life-time consequences forI would have made the choice myself if only I knew about the plus lens!
you -- what ever decision.
I would NEVER allow a person to make that typeForget what they say, just learn how to use a plus lens and you are set!
of decision or choice for me -- when some
"third-party" considers my desire to keep
my distant vision -- a joke.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- From: Mike Tyner
- Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- From: Dr. Leukoma
- Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- References:
- FACE FACTS: How and Why the PUBLIC rejects plus-prevention
- From: otisbrown@xxxxxx
- Re: FACE FACTS: How and Why the PUBLIC rejects plus-prevention
- From: Dr. Leukoma
- Re: FACE FACTS: How and Why the PUBLIC rejects plus-prevention
- From: otisbrown@xxxxxx
- Re: FACE FACTS: How and Why the PUBLIC rejects plus-prevention
- From: p . clarkii
- Great minds think alike, Otis!
- From: acemanvx
- Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- From: otisbrown@xxxxxx
- Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- From: acemanvx
- FACE FACTS: How and Why the PUBLIC rejects plus-prevention
- Prev by Date: Re: minus prevention
- Next by Date: Re: Americans getting too fat for eye exams too.
- Previous by thread: Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- Next by thread: Re: Great minds think alike, Otis!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|