Re: Pupillary distance
- From: Robert Martellaro <robopt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:56:47 -0500
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:05:46 +0000 (UTC), Tony Houghton
<this.address.is.fake@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In <44be355c$0$72148$c30e37c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Dom <dont@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Tony Houghton wrote:
My optician has given me two PD figures: 66 distance and 63 near. I tend
to spend more time reading and using a computer than driving and outdoor
activities. For single vision lenses, which figure would it be better to
use, or should I compromise somewhere in between?
Are you short sighted (minus prescription) or long sighted (plus
prescription)?
R: Sph -6.25 Cyl -0.75 Axis 15
L: Sph -6.50 Cyl -0.50 Axis 42.5
Your dispensing optician should determine the monocular interpupillary distance.
The numbers should look like- 35/31, 33/33, or 32/34, in other words each eye
individually. Very important for complex lens designs (aspherics, atorics, PALs)
and for stronger powers.
I would usually use the distance IPD for both distance and readers, allowing the
principal axis to pass through the center of rotation of the eye.
Hope this helps,
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
.
- References:
- Pupillary distance
- From: Tony Houghton
- Re: Pupillary distance
- From: Dom
- Re: Pupillary distance
- From: Tony Houghton
- Pupillary distance
- Prev by Date: Re: Multipurpose Solutions?
- Next by Date: Re: Can a myope improve unaided sight - YES or NO
- Previous by thread: Re: Pupillary distance
- Next by thread: Re: Pupillary distance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading