Re: 39 dollar glasses
- From: Salmon Egg <salmonegg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:56:25 GMT
On 4/28/06 7:05 AM, in article
%ip4g.70625$H71.6671@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "William Stacy"
<wstacy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CatmanX wrote:
I can sell you a left lens for $39.00.I recieved a pair of lenses for a patient yesterday and the lab invoice
dr grant
was $229.
My wholsale cost on the frame was $120.
What do you think I should charge the patient?
w.stacy, o.d.
(trivex photochromatic progressives with super AR in a Silhouette
rimless...)
What is so special about the lenses that your cost ($229) is that high? If I
were to get a pair of lenses from one of those cheap guys, what would I lose
out on?
To me, not in the optometric field, it strikes me that getting
ophthalmologic lens blanks from B&L or whoever makes them these days and
edging them for $39 is not unreasonable. Hype that raises the price may be.
Although I no longer use single vision lenses I would be happy to do without
photochromaticity or progressiveness, and all the other cosmetic stuff. I
would like to get good anti-reflective coagtings, but I have not been able
to find anyone who still applies hot coatings to glass. I do without.
Bill
-- Ferme le Bush
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 39 dollar glasses
- From: Dr. Leukoma
- Re: 39 dollar glasses
- References:
- 39 dollar glasses
- From: rwj81
- Re: 39 dollar glasses
- From: Salmon Egg
- Re: 39 dollar glasses
- From: Robert Kopp
- Re: 39 dollar glasses
- From: CatmanX
- Re: 39 dollar glasses
- From: William Stacy
- 39 dollar glasses
- Prev by Date: Re: Beware people trying to SELL you things [Otis]
- Next by Date: Re: 39 dollar glasses
- Previous by thread: Re: 39 dollar glasses
- Next by thread: Re: 39 dollar glasses
- Index(es):