Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- From: "Mike Tyner" <mtyner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:44:59 GMT
<acemanvx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
> If they were informed and you told them the pros and cons of each, im
> sure nearly everyone would be willing to give orthoK a shot rather than
> jumping strait to the laser mill.
I've done that.
What they don't like is 1) it's temporary 2) it's unpredictable and 3) it's
expensive for a non-permanent procedure.
-MT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- From: acemanvx
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- References:
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- From: Dr. Leukoma
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- From: acemanvx
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- From: Quick
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- From: acemanvx
- Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- Prev by Date: Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- Next by Date: Re: They invented wavefront glasses and claim supervision!
- Previous by thread: Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- Next by thread: Re: Orthokeratology competing with laser surgury
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|