Re: Child needs glasses?

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 05:33:36 GMT, William Stacy <wstacy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>You are correct that I don't have the chart in front of me. But I do
>know that no matter what the "real" refraction is, +.50 O.U. is going to
>do absolutely nothing for anything. I have no problem with getting a
>2nd opinion, but to get all worked up about the +.50 is idiotic. Nothing
>in the post suggests anything serious is happening.
>
>Enough of this; I'm out of here for 2 weeks (sailing to Cabo San Lucas).
>
>w.stacy, o.d.
>

Hmmm...I'd strongly recommend a life jacket lest you actually believe you can
walk on water.

Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
robopt@xxxxxxxxxx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman
.