Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- From: "D. Spencer Hines" <panther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:38:06 +0100
"Pete" <pete.burger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1603e689-3538-436f-a943-9946d3af6a16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There aer already risk vs benefit ideals out there.. the problem is
the risk most physicians have to consider it to their careers. and i
don't really blame them.. one x-ray could be the difference between a
career ending law suit and being able to remain in practice.
Radiation Risk of the X-Ray ---- OR risk of making an incorrect diagnosis
because the X-Ray was not taken and is not available to be offered up as
evidence in a trial?
What we need is tort reform. Which we will never get because
politicans are lawyers.. especially the 2 Democratic nominees..
Yes... We do need tort reform. So don't elect either of the two Democrats.
I for one cannot blame a physician for ordering these test for
lawyers.. too much at stake not to
Fair Enough...
But why not give patients more information about radiation risks as well?
DSH
Lux et Veritas et Libertas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- From: Bolaleman
- Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- From: D. Spencer Hines
- Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- From: Pete
- Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- Prev by Date: Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- Next by Date: Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- Previous by thread: Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- Next by thread: Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|