Re: PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- From: "Bill" <bill_hale@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Jun 2006 16:43:30 -0700
Same exact answer. Spinal highly recommended.
I was able to observe the procedure. Bill Hale Loveland CO
Temujin wrote:
I had it done on a spinal, in South Carolina. I woke absolutely
clear-headed, no grogginess, but still had to stay in recovery for
three hours until I could move my feet. This happened to me before
after a spinal, so I guess I'm abnormally sensitive to it. I still
think the spinal was worth it to avoid the anesthesia "hangover."
Results are great so far, at three months - fabulous stream, complete
emptying, no discomfort, no meds. Still some false urgency, but that
is improving.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- From: Dad's kid
- Re: PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- References:
- PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- From: Dad's kid
- Re: PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- From: Temujin
- PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- Prev by Date: Re: 3 weeks post pvp frequency/urgency problems
- Next by Date: Re: PVP by Dr Lin St Augstine Fl
- Previous by thread: Re: PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- Next by thread: Re: PVP on non-general anaesthetic?
- Index(es):