Re: Pandemic preparation by Henry I. Miller
- From: "Yuriwaka" <dm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 22:07:15 GMT
To throw a spanner in the works-- doctors in dealing with H5N1 on the ground
in asian countries are reporting that Tamiflu is not effective for this
virus.(although there is some debate on the time scale of its
administration -?too little too late?). As usual although governments plan
ahead for these events until they happen we just don't know! Also a
microbiologist I work with occassionally is convinced there will be a
pandemic soon but it won't be H5N1.
"Mike" <yard22192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1129645567.235362.54470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Pandemic preparation by Henry I. Miller
> Published October 16, 2005
>
> I have a long and intimate relationship with influenza virus. More
> than 30 years ago, I co-discovered one of the viral enzymes essential
> for the virus to duplicate and proliferate. Later, my medical training
> taught me respect for this pathogen. Real influenza -- as opposed to a
> garden-variety cold -- is a serious illness. Its victims don't soon
> forget the fever, headache, muscle aches and profound weakness. In an
> average year -- despite usually at least moderately effective vaccines
> -- it kills tens of thousands in this country.
> It seems the flu virus is now poised to repeat a
> several-times-a-century metamorphosis into something far worse.
> First, some background. The exterior of the flu virus consists of a
> lipid envelope from which project two surface proteins, hemagglutinin
> (H) and neuraminidase (N). The virus constantly mutates, which may
> cause significant alterations in either or both of these, enabling the
> virus to elude detection and neutralization by humans' immune system.
> A minor change is called genetic drift; a major one, genetic shift.
> The former is the reason flu vaccines need to be updated from year to
> year; an example was the change in subtype from H1N1 to H2N2 that gave
> rise to the 1957 pandemic. This new variant was distinct enough that
> people had little immunity: The rate of infection of symptomatic flu
> that year exceeded 50 percent in urban populations, and 70,000 died
> from it in the United States alone.
> In the 1957 outbreak, the mortality rate (the fraction of infected
> persons who die) was low. But we appear to be on the verge of another,
> much worse pandemic.
> During the last several years, an especially virulent strain of
> avian flu, designated H5N1, has ravaged domesticated poultry in Asia
> and spread to migratory birds and (rarely) to humans. Now found from
> Russia and Japan to Indonesia, it is moving inexorably toward Europe.
> Since 2003, more than 60 human deaths have been attributed to H5N1.
> Public health experts and virologists are concerned about the
> potential of this strain because it already has two of the three
> characteristics needed to cause a pandemic: It can jump from birds to
> human, and can produce a severe and often fatal illness. If additional
> genetic evolution makes H5N1 very transmissible among humans (the third
> characteristic of a pandemic strain) a devastating worldwide outbreak
> could occur.
> Moreover, this is an extraordinarily deadly variant: The mortality
> rate for persons infected with the existing H5N1 appears about 50
> percent. The usual annual flu kills fewer than 1 percent.
> We are ill-prepared for a flu pandemic. Reserves are grossly
> inadequate of vaccines, drugs and hospital beds. Technological,
> economic and logistical obstacles abound to the best and most
> cost-effective intervention -- a preventive vaccine.
> Anti-flu drugs exist but are not a panacea. Unlike vaccines, which
> confer long-term immunity after one or two doses, drugs must be taken
> for long periods. The only drug shown to prevent the flu is Tamiflu. A
> prophylactic dose is one tablet daily, the effect lasting only as long
> the drug is taken. (The other major anti-flu medicine, Relenza, has
> been shown effective only for treating, but not preventing, flu.)
> Historically, flu pandemics have come in two or three waves,
> lasting 13-23 months. In other words, the need to take Tamiflu -- by
> first responders, health-care workers and ordinary citizens -- could go
> on for months and months, or even years.
> U.S. public health officials have said they plan to buy 20 million
> doses of Tamiflu, but that would be enough to treat only 200,000 people
> (fewer than total attendance of a seven-game World Series) for 100
> days. And the retail price per pill is around $8, so it would cost $160
> million to treating that small number of people for that length of
> time.
> According to various models, without enough effective vaccine --
> which is not yet within reach -- to blunt a pandemic, we would need to
> treat perhaps a third to a half of the population with Tamiflu. Do the
> math: 100 million people for 100 days equals 10 billion doses, at a
> retail cost of $80 billion, to blunt the pandemic's first wave.
> Though President Bush and Health and Human Services Secretary Mike
> Leavitt are saying some of the right things about the need to prepare
> for the pandemic, if they or their staffs have calculated all this,
> they give no sign of it.
> We need push-pull incentives to forming public-private
> partnerships. Public policy must reward both inputs on research and
> development (via grants, tax credits and waiver of regulatory
> registration fees) and treatment outputs (with guaranteed purchases,
> payments for the regulatory approval of new drugs or vaccines, and
> liability indemnification).
> Part of this effort should be R&D on various new technologies and
> approaches to making flu vaccine, to boosting the immune response to
> vaccines, and to creating greater reserve capacity for producing drugs
> like Tamiflu and Relenza.
> Preparing for pandemic flu involves many thorny issues of science,
> technology and medicine, but also much more. It requires contingency
> plans for "social" aspects of a deadly pandemic -- when to shut our
> borders to travelers from infected regions, close schools, restrict
> public gatherings and enforce quarantines, and a designated chain of
> command to carry out those decisions.
> Like the WWII Manhattan Project to develop the atomic bomb,
> preparation for a flu pandemic involves scientific uncertainties,
> strategic decisions that span many specialties and government
> departments, and prodigious resources. To oversee all this, we'll need
> a flu-pandemic czar -- someone analogous to U.S. Army Gen. Leslie
> Groves, who headed the Manhattan Project: a plenipotentiary with broad
> powers and discretion.
> There is no time to waste.
>
> Henry I. Miller, a physician and fellow at the Hoover Institution,
> was founding director of the Office of Biotechnology at the Food and
> Drug Administration, 1989-1993. Barron's selected his latest book, "The
> Frankenfood Myth ... " as one of the 25 Best Books of 2004.
>
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Robot Assistants for Nurses?
- Next by Date: Ellen Gail Fine, Ph.D., neonatal unit, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Miami Beach
- Previous by thread: Re: Robot Assistants for Nurses?
- Next by thread: Ellen Gail Fine, Ph.D., neonatal unit, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Miami Beach
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
