Feed the troll
- From: Mike McWilliams <m_mcw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:25:59 -0600
You say that homeopaths are impervious to this change. This is not the
case because though disease names have changed and the disease has gone
to the next stage, the underlying miasm remains the same. As the
homeopaths apply their miasmatic approach, neoplastic diseases will go
back to their vascular origin and then the original acute infection
will surface which, when cured by using homeopathic principles, will
rid the person of disease. This is the within-outward motion of disease
as discovered and recorded by Hahnemann.
Say what?
when you treat my cancer with something thats been diluted many millions of times over to the point where the chances of even one molecule of the original cure being present is nigh zero, and back up the claim that the solvent has "memory"...
The fact is that allopathy can be harmful. It's a fact of life. If you want to have surgery to remove a tumour, the procedure is often successful. Thats not to say its without risk. The anesthesia randomly kills something like 1 in 50,000. The complications from surgery can include secondary infections which can kill someone with a weakened immune system. Those who survive this relatively routine procedure can live with no further discomfort perhaps till the end of a normal lifespan.
The alternative is to avoid the short term risk, start popping C2 diluted crap having faith that you're being cured. Most people who follow this path will even get a few more years than the unfortunates who dont survive the surgical approach. However, when the cancer metastasizes and they end up with tumours all over their body, you can be pretty much sure that they will not have anything remotely resembling a normal lifespan.
The fact is, some people spontaneously have regression of tumours, and those people are lucky. For these people any intervention would be a mistake. The allopathic approach would carry the most risks for these people, because the homeopathic approach is basically neutral in terms of potential for harm.
So in the very rare case when someone has spontaneous regression and has chosen the homeopathic approach, it's touted as a success. The fact is that solutions containing less than one molecule on average of so called cure are doing basically nothing for them, harm or good.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Feed the troll
- From: kumar
- Re: Feed the troll
- References:
- Homeopathy vs allopathy - Part 2.
- From: jagchat01@xxxxxxxxx
- Homeopathy vs allopathy - Part 2.
- Prev by Date: Homeopathy vs allopathy - Part 2.
- Next by Date: Abnormal complement and Dermographism
- Previous by thread: Homeopathy vs allopathy - Part 2.
- Next by thread: Re: Feed the troll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|