Re: Fullblast

"Nick Worley" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3sctmdFngl4tU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "James Lee" <nospam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3a7f6$4360c8f1$5393c0a1$750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [snip]
>> .. with the association of maximum volume.
>
> Definitely, you can speak of music *blasting* out of the speakers (i.e.
> coming out of the speakers with maximum force, so loud in fact that you
> can *feel* the sound waves as they vibrate your body and your bodily
> organs, as well as *hearing* them).
>
> In the OP's context I'd say that "fullblast" means something like
> "full-on" (i.e. intense <video music downloads>), but it also conveys the
> idea of maximum volume (but which in the context of mobile/cell phones
> doesn't really make sense when you think about it -- it's just marketing
> hype IMO).

"full-blast/full-on/intense video music downloads" don't really make much
sense in the context of mobile phones either IMO.
It's just marketing bull*** IMO to make something distinctly underwhelming
sound much more glamourous than it actually is (again IMO).
(I mean how *full-on* can a music download on a *mobile phone* sound? Not
very, right?! Play it on a half-decent stereo (such as a Denon) and with
half-decent headphones (such as Sennheiser), then it's another matter).
Regards
Nick


.

Quantcast