Re: Large earthquakes may broadcast warnings, but is anyone tuning in to listen?
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:23:53 -0000
ellis@xxxxxxx () wrote in news:1200350953.414471@xxxxxxx:
In article <13olql528rnup4e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob Officer <bobofficers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
hmmm...3hz is just a tad under 10k km wavelength....
Shouldn't that be 100 km?
hmmmm....299,792,458 m/s
÷ 3
-----------
99,930,819.333 meters
÷ 1000
----------
99,930.819 kilometers
Yep, goofed the decimal place.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: so much for tongue-in-cheek
- Next by Date: Re: Large earthquakes may broadcast warnings, but is anyone tuning in to listen?
- Previous by thread: Re: Large earthquakes may broadcast warnings, but is anyone tuning in to listen?
- Next by thread: Re: Large earthquakes may broadcast warnings, but is anyone tuning in to listen?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
