US Ports Seen Vulnerable To Earthquake Damage



http://www.terradaily.com/reports/US_Ports_Seen_Vulnerable_To_Earthquake_Damage.html

by Staff Writers
Atlanta GA (SPX) May 24, 2006
If a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake were to occur, the Port of
Oakland could be so severely damaged it would take up to two years to
resume full operations, researchers reported Tuesday.
U.S. ports serve as crucial gateways for international trade, but they're
particularly vulnerable to damage in an earthquake. Western U.S. ports in
Oakland, Los Angeles, Long Beach and Seattle are at the greatest risk for
earthquake damage, but eastern U.S. ports in Charleston, S.C., and
Savannah, Ga., also are at risk.

Georgia Institute of Technology researchers are developing strategies to
help safeguard ports from earthquake damage. The National Science
Foundation has provided $3.6 million in funding over the next five years.

"Ports are a critical civil infrastructure system," said Glenn J. Rix, the
project's director. "Given the growth in international trade, we don't
think seismic risks at ports have received the proper amount of attention.
If a large portion of a major U.S. port such as Oakland or Los Angeles were
out of service for a year because of an earthquake, there would be
significant economic consequences for the United States."

In 1995, a magnitude 6.9 earthquake struck in Kobe, Japan, causing
extensive damage to both the city and its port, the sixth largest in the
world at the time. The port required $8.6 billion and two years to repair.
By 2003, the Port of Kobe had fallen to 32nd largest in the world and will
likely never recover the lost business.

Ports are particularly vulnerable to damage during earthquakes because
wharves are often built on unstable ground that is prone to liquefaction -
a process that causes soil to lose its strength as a result of ground
shaking. The large cranes used to load and unload containers from ships are
also susceptible to damage from ground shaking and deformation.

The project's goal is to help port authorities and other stakeholders
manage seismic risk more effectively.

"Modern ports are large, complex systems," Rix said. "Our project team
includes researchers and practitioners with expertise in civil engineering,
logistics, risk analysis, and social science to address seismic risk issues
in every aspect of the system."

A key part of the project is to evaluate methods of preventing damage to
wharves and cranes using large-scale tests. The team will perform the tests
at four labs in the George E. Brown Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering
Simulation, a program initiated by NSF to advance the field of earthquake
engineering with a shared network of experimental sites and tools, an
archive of earthquake data and earthquake engineering simulation software.

The team also will investigate applying the same approach to managing risks
from other natural hazards, including hurricanes.

"We learned an important lesson from the experience of Gulf Coast ports
following Hurricane Katrina," Rix said. "The physical damage was minor
compared to the impact of the displaced labor force on port operations,
which emphasized the need to examine the entire port system."


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: My Hurricane Katrina Predictions
    ... >>Damage in the Mobile area is much worse than it was from Ivan last year. ... > we're waiting for the Big One, the earthquake that's likely to either knock ... How is Antarctica climatically safe? ... No risk of hurricanes or tsunamis. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Samba - iptables
    ... The lines that directly affect the SMB/CIFS ports should be sufficient, ... but I can't say the risk is zero. ... > in order to affect the broadcast. ...
    (linux.redhat.misc)
  • Re: RDP connection via dyndns
    ... In this case where only two ports are needed opening another port is probably the lesser risk. ... If you wanted to rdp to several computers or even all computers on the network then the VPN would be a better option. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: RDP connection via dyndns
    ... the router for rdp can also be a a security risk. ... two ports are needed opening another port is probably the lesser risk. ... VPN connection and leave all the workstations listening on the default rdp ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
  • Re: RDP connection via dyndns
    ... In this case where only two ports are needed opening another port is probably the lesser risk. ... If you wanted to rdp to several computers or even all computers on the network then the VPN would be a better option. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)