Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: "George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:26:50 GMT
"John Krempasky" <johnk8spamless@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:McOdnZS8t47ESmDe4p2dnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g5cLf.573383$084.208723@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Earthquakes resulting from extraction within oil fields is well known.
Whether this one was caused by Shell extracting oil in the region has
yet
to be proved. But it wouldn't surprise me if it did.
Umm...did you see the part that claimed the Gulf of Mexico was
geologically
similar to the area of the Sumatran Megathrust?
Yes I did, and it is nonsense.
Did you read the additional article blaming the Sumatran Megathrust on
Exxon-Mobil?
The was a different story, and that is BS as well.
George
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: Don
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- References:
- 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: Skywise
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: krolradio
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: John Krempasky
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: George
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: John Krempasky
- 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Prev by Date: Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Next by Date: Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Previous by thread: Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Next by thread: Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Index(es):
