Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: Aidan Karley <doIlookDAFTenoughTOpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:00:05 GMT
In article <11vq9je6fi9nu2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Skywise wrote:
"An undersea landslide - technically, a "slump" - about 90Did they manage to get a hypocentric depth for the original
miles off Galveston once sent some 12 to 14 cubic miles of
earth sliding down.
quake?
There's mixing going on between the story of this Feb quake, and
the historical one I'm quoting about above. I was getting close to
asking if there was evidence of turbidity out in the Gulf from the
slump.
--
Aidan Karley FGS
Aberdeen, Scotland,
Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: Belba Grubb From Stock
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: Skywise
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: George
- Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- References:
- 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- From: Skywise
- 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Prev by Date: Re: Revised M 7.5...
- Next by Date: Re: Arenophiles
- Previous by thread: Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Next by thread: Re: 5.2 Gulf of Mexico probably a slump
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
