Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- From: "Petra" <petrasrcf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 17 Dec 2005 23:15:41 -0800
Skywise wrote:
> "Petra" <petrasrcf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1134881751.769950.28820
> @g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>
> <Snipola>
>
> I don't have a problem with a little "peer review". I have
> nothing to hide.
>
> In fact, my intent all along has been to include for the final
> report all the data I used and the computer code. I'll also
> get into details about how I went about things, and of course
> explain how I determined my predictions (the one thing I want
> to keep secret for the moment).
>
> If no one is in too much of a hurry, I think more data is
> better. Like I pointed out yesterday my stats keep creeping
> upward. I am curious to see if they level off or maybe slide
> back a bit eventually. Also, Stan's stats are likely to
> improve with more data. 25 maps is a bit small of a dataset,
> yes?
>
> After all, wasn't it you Petra that had originally suggested
> doing this for three months or so? Today's map is only the
> 52nd. Since I've figured out how I can check Stans maps in
> reasonable time I'm willing to give it a full 90 days if you
> are.
>
> Brian
Brian,
90 days is just fine... but I did think you were losing interest when
you said you weren't tracking Deyo's predictions anymore.
Is there any chance you are using the USGS map with the curious lines I
showed you for your predictions? I see this week we had the
Fiji/Chile connection. Yeah, I'm curious.
Petra
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- From: Skywise
- Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- References:
- EQDB vs Deyo
- From: Skywise
- Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- From: Petra
- Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- From: Skywise
- EQDB vs Deyo
- Prev by Date: Re: earthquake forecast calendar maps
- Next by Date: Re: LETTERS OF BLOOD
- Previous by thread: Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- Next by thread: Re: EQDB vs Deyo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|