Re: Plate Tectonics Graphics?


Alan wrote:
> In article <1133544739.681836.55600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx (oriel36) wrote:
>
> > No offense Alan but far from bothering to question the type of
> > mindnumbing reasoning of these guys it is far easier to let natural
> > observations dictate the agenda and the avenues.None of the early
> > heliocentrists cared much for attacking the older system of the
> > Ptolemaics and there explanation for retrogrades through epicycles,they
> > simply grafted in the annual orbital motion of the Earth which infers
> > heliocentricity and then worked on refining the system such as the
> > Keplerian and Roemerian refinements.
>
> LOL But my Grandad was something of a comedian, and his cousin may have, or
> may not have, gone to America, and became an ever bigger comedian and even got a
> day named after him, and sometimes I just kind of follow in his footsteps :-)
>
>
> > Rather than take a closer examination at convection cells/stationary
> > Earth,the better resolution involves standing further back and taking a
> > look at the Earth in motion and especially the plastic-molten
> > mantle.Considering that the Equatorial bulge is assigned a mechanism
> > based on a vague reference to axial rotation,the Earth's shape and the
> > profile which the component plates follow has an easier solution
> > through differential rotation bands in the rotating mantle.
> >
> > What are fluid engineers doing given that the dynamics of a moving
> > fluid or gas in a rotating celestial object is extremely difficult to
> > ignore.This is why I have to constantly refresh the observation of the
> > Sun's rotation as a guide for the mechanism which causes the Earth's
> > shape to deviate from a perfect sphere.
> >
> > http://www.astronomynotes.com/starsun/sun-rotation.gif
> >
> > Aberdeen Angus and his pal are stuck with a convection cells/stationary
> > Earth mechanism,they may absolutely detest that the mechanism but
> > having no literature availible on differential rotation bands they are
> > forced to grovel in what must be a horrible position of being neither
> > intuitive,original or intelligent.
> >
> > For everyone else,it should be just a matter of course that the
> > Earth's shape comes under the geological umbrella without undue fuss
> > and from what I can make of the brief outlines,it is comfortable to
> > work with the Earth's rotating dynamics for the shape and the motion of
> > the component plates .It is difficult if impossible to imagine a
> > different way to generate the Equatorial bulge other than the mechanism
> > of differential rotation bands already observed in other rotating
> > objects.
> >
> > Do you know what Alan,it is also fun.
>
> Hey, you have got Einstein on your web-page and I quote:
>






> Time and space are relative to the motion of an observer and they are not
> independent of each other. Time and space are connected to make four-dimensional
> spacetime (three dimensions for space and one dimension for time). This is not
> that strange---we often define distances by the time it takes light to travel
> between two points. For example, one light year is the distance light will
> travel in a year. To talk about an event, you will usually tell where (in space)
> and when (in time) it happened. The event happened in spacetime.
>
> and:
>
> Special Relativity also predicts that matter can be converted into energy and
> energy in to matter. By applying Newton's second law of motion to the energy of
> motion for something moving at high speed (its ``kinetic energy''), you will
> find that energy = mass × (speed of light)2. More concisely, this is Einstein's
> famous equation, E = mc2. This result also applies to an object at rest in which
> case, you will refer to its ``rest mass'' and its ``rest energy'', the energy
> equivalent of mass.
>
> Hey, didn't I tell them that matter can be converted into energy and energy in
> to matter? But they just go on quoting what they were taught without giving it
> any thought. Aberdeen Angus and his pals probably never read anything of what
> Einstein actually wrote. As for Newton, they probably don't know who he was.
>
>
> Alan
>
> http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html
>
> http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/


Relativists are a symptom of the Newtonian disease and are even more
unlikely to comprehend the dynamics of differential rotation bands
simultaneously generating the Earth's shape and crustal motion than
Newtonians.

I read what the originator of the 1905 concept had to say and it is
frightening for its vacuousness and especially that the concept could
be found in the science fiction section of a bookstore in 1898 *.

So,keeping in mind that it is far more productive to consider the
actual (do you understand the word 'actual' ) observation of a rotating
celestial object comprised of something other than a solid,you can keep
you homocentric relativistic nonsense.

I had been comfortable enough to post Aberdeen Angus a site with the
usual garbage of the Equatorial bulge all adorned with Newtonian and
relativistic nonsense,obviously doing this is a dangerous thing
considering how you managed to turn the observation of differential
rotation bands into a response based on who does and who does not
understand Albert or Isaac.

It is people like you who turn investigation of celestial and
terrestial phenomena into a stinking cistern instead of the fountain it
really is.






*
"'Scientific people,' proceeded the Time Traveller, after the pause
required for the proper assimilation of this, 'know very well that
Time is only a kind of Space"

http://www.bartleby.com/1000/1.html

"What does the word 'spacetime' mean?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It means that in our universe, 3-dimensional space and time form a
single indivisible new physical object which has 4 dimensions. All
physical laws and phenomena seem to require thinking about space and
time as this blended object. That's what Einstein's relativity theories
were all about. "

http://einstein.stanford.edu/

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Plate Tectonics Graphics?
    ... > simply grafted in the annual orbital motion of the Earth which infers ... > through differential rotation bands in the rotating mantle. ... > For everyone else,it should be just a matter of course that the ... energy in to matter. ...
    (sci.geo.earthquakes)
  • Re: Newtonian physics derived from P(t)=0=E(t)
    ... m coshthey call relativistic energy which is likewise conserved. ... his laws of motion. ... all of relativity as Lorentz originally explained his transformations. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: PHOTON HAS NO MASS -
    ... Whut in tarnation is th' Mass of a Photon? ... tool to measure relative motion. ... Relativity is a subset of the universe, ... necessarily includes the energy accruing to a mass due to its ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PHOTON HAS NO MASS -
    ... Whut in tarnation is th' Mass of a Photon? ... tool to measure relative motion. ... Relativity is a subset of the universe, ... necessarily includes the energy accruing to a mass due to its ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Shrinking Earth
    ... the Earth's shape and crustal motion against the 'shells' that even ... The observation of differential rotation bands in the mantle, ... wasting their time with convection cells/stationary Earth. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)