Re: Plate Tectonics Graphics?

In article <1133544739.681836.55600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx (oriel36) wrote:

> No offense Alan but far from bothering to question the type of
> mindnumbing reasoning of these guys it is far easier to let natural
> observations dictate the agenda and the avenues.None of the early
> heliocentrists cared much for attacking the older system of the
> Ptolemaics and there explanation for retrogrades through epicycles,they
> simply grafted in the annual orbital motion of the Earth which infers
> heliocentricity and then worked on refining the system such as the
> Keplerian and Roemerian refinements.

LOL But my Grandad was something of a comedian, and his cousin may have, or
may not have, gone to America, and became an ever bigger comedian and even got a
day named after him, and sometimes I just kind of follow in his footsteps :-)


> Rather than take a closer examination at convection cells/stationary
> Earth,the better resolution involves standing further back and taking a
> look at the Earth in motion and especially the plastic-molten
> mantle.Considering that the Equatorial bulge is assigned a mechanism
> based on a vague reference to axial rotation,the Earth's shape and the
> profile which the component plates follow has an easier solution
> through differential rotation bands in the rotating mantle.
>
> What are fluid engineers doing given that the dynamics of a moving
> fluid or gas in a rotating celestial object is extremely difficult to
> ignore.This is why I have to constantly refresh the observation of the
> Sun's rotation as a guide for the mechanism which causes the Earth's
> shape to deviate from a perfect sphere.
>
> http://www.astronomynotes.com/starsun/sun-rotation.gif
>
> Aberdeen Angus and his pal are stuck with a convection cells/stationary
> Earth mechanism,they may absolutely detest that the mechanism but
> having no literature availible on differential rotation bands they are
> forced to grovel in what must be a horrible position of being neither
> intuitive,original or intelligent.
>
> For everyone else,it should be just a matter of course that the
> Earth's shape comes under the geological umbrella without undue fuss
> and from what I can make of the brief outlines,it is comfortable to
> work with the Earth's rotating dynamics for the shape and the motion of
> the component plates .It is difficult if impossible to imagine a
> different way to generate the Equatorial bulge other than the mechanism
> of differential rotation bands already observed in other rotating
> objects.
>
> Do you know what Alan,it is also fun.

Hey, you have got Einstein on your web-page and I quote:

Time and space are relative to the motion of an observer and they are not
independent of each other. Time and space are connected to make four-dimensional
spacetime (three dimensions for space and one dimension for time). This is not
that strange---we often define distances by the time it takes light to travel
between two points. For example, one light year is the distance light will
travel in a year. To talk about an event, you will usually tell where (in space)
and when (in time) it happened. The event happened in spacetime.

and:

Special Relativity also predicts that matter can be converted into energy and
energy in to matter. By applying Newton's second law of motion to the energy of
motion for something moving at high speed (its ``kinetic energy''), you will
find that energy = mass × (speed of light)2. More concisely, this is Einstein's
famous equation, E = mc2. This result also applies to an object at rest in which
case, you will refer to its ``rest mass'' and its ``rest energy'', the energy
equivalent of mass.

Hey, didn't I tell them that matter can be converted into energy and energy in
to matter? But they just go on quoting what they were taught without giving it
any thought. Aberdeen Angus and his pals probably never read anything of what
Einstein actually wrote. As for Newton, they probably don't know who he was.


Alan

http://www.veloceraptor.free-online.co.uk/enigma.html

http://veloceraptor.blogspot.com/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Plate Tectonics Graphics?
    ... >> simply grafted in the annual orbital motion of the Earth which infers ... >> through differential rotation bands in the rotating mantle. ... > energy in to matter. ... That's what Einstein's relativity theories ...
    (sci.geo.earthquakes)
  • Re: Matter, energy, space, and direction.
    ... >> Is it fair to say that at any one instant, all matter in the universe ... But in terms of one instant, motion is irrelevant to position. ... the universe is located in space at a particular position relative to all other particles ... but even the energy depends on the observer. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Revised Hypothesis
    ... Neither matter nor energy conceptualizes. ... > of this universe through motion and distance. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Revised Hypothesis
    ... Neither matter nor energy conceptualizes. ... of this universe through motion and distance. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Bill Bryson and the big bang
    ... >> It appears when energy is emitted and disappears after the energy is ... no matter if these fields are static or propagate. ... >> They both represent mass in a state that resists change. ... >> and the other in motion. ...
    (sci.astro)