Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 23:12:41 -0000
"Petra" <petrasrcf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1132464052.808003.246800
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
<Snipola>
> AND???? So how do your results compare with Stan Deyo's for the same
> period? 74% is quite good really. I'm impressed. Honestly, I was
> thinking you'd get about 60%, but these are early results. I suppose
> the long term would be more revealing?
>
> How you feel about continuing this program?
>
> Petra
I expect the accuracy to fluctuate quite a bit as more data is
checked.
The 24th will be four weeks of this project. I'd like to go
longer but I may already have all the data I need to meet my
original goals.
As for Stan....errr....I'll save that for the final report.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Supernews sucks - blocking google, usenet.com & newsfeeds.com posts
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- From: Skywise
- Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- From: Petra
- Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- References:
- Earthquake Dart Board update
- From: Skywise
- Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- From: Petra
- Earthquake Dart Board update
- Prev by Date: Re: Which is safer?
- Next by Date: Re: Don's blog
- Previous by thread: Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- Next by thread: Re: Earthquake Dart Board update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|