Re: Earthquake Dart Board update




Skywise wrote:
> Just an update about my Earthquake Dart Board "predictions".
>
> Enough time has elapsed that I've started confirming the
> "predictions" against the NEIC catalog. I've spent a few hours
> perfecting a program to do the testing for me and to generate
> a well formatted output.
>
> Something very significant I've realized is that my success
> rate is much lower than originally anticipated. This is due to
> using the fuller more complete catalog than just those quakes
> that are deemed 'significant' and posted on the daily webpage.
> Not all quakes make it onto the daily list.
>
> Based on the daily list I was running around 90% plus accuracy.
> With the current confirmation run I'm only at 74%.
>
> There is a link at the top of my webpage which will take you
> to the confirmed list.
>
> http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
>
> Brian


AND???? So how do your results compare with Stan Deyo's for the same
period? 74% is quite good really. I'm impressed. Honestly, I was
thinking you'd get about 60%, but these are early results. I suppose
the long term would be more revealing?

How you feel about continuing this program?

Petra

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lightspeed exceeded
    ... So this confirming instance does not prove my theory correct. ... And Vessot's example fit my predictions, ... results came out that way because Vessot was biased etc. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Lightspeed exceeded
    ... So this confirming instance does not prove my theory correct. ... And Vessot's example fit my predictions, ... results came out that way because Vessot was biased etc. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Definition of A Field
    ... >> Confirming some of the predictions of SR is not a good way to falsify ... > a way to falsify it. ... > And these experiments were empirical tests of SR, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Definition of A Field
    ... >> Confirming some of the predictions of SR is not a good way to falsify ... > a way to falsify it. ... > And these experiments were empirical tests of SR, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Earthquake Dart Board update
    ... Enough time has elapsed that I've started confirming the ... "predictions" against the NEIC catalog. ... that are deemed 'significant' and posted on the daily webpage. ... Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? ...
    (sci.geo.earthquakes)