Re: "Cracking the Code of Pre-Earthquake Signals"

"George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:clk6f.456579$_o.397214
@attbi_s71:

<Snipola>
> That is a good point. But then, if we don't take a serious look at it,
> we'll never know for certain whether or not there is a signal. Negative
> results can also be good science. It narrows possibilities.

Very true. I agree. Then the next problem is the proposal.

"Yes, I'd like 23 million to build and launch a satellite to
look for negative results."

One would probably have to look at data gathered for another
purpose, kinda like using oil company surveys to map fault
lines and not oil.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Supernews sucks - blocking google, usenet.com & newsfeeds.com posts
.

Relevant Pages