Re: Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- From: "William R. Frensley" <frensley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:29:19 GMT
olongdomango@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello,
While reviewing literature on metal-semiconductor junctions, I came across a definition for a "neutral contact", which was described as the junction that is formed when two materials with identical work functions are joined, so that no band bending occurs. This makes sense for two identical materials, but if for example, an n-type semiconductor with a wide forbidden band gap and a metal somehow had the same work functions and were joined, I appreciate that there would be no built-in potential barrier, but wouldn't a Schottky barrier be formed due to the position of the conduction band edge over the common Fermi level? Would electrons still not have to overcome this barrier if the metal was biased negative wrt the semiconductor? Is it that metal electrons simply tunnel into the forbidden gap, where they are swept to the conduction band under the influence of the external bias? If so, wouldn't there not be a minimum bias required to achieve this, which would be proportional to the size of the energy gap between the Fermi-level and the conduction band? Sorry for all the questions, but I would be glad if someone could help me to clarify my understanding.
This sort of "neutral contact" doesn't say anything about the transport properties [I(V) curve]. If you have, say a typical semiconductor like Si lightly doped p-type or GaAs very lightly doped n-type, you can get a flat energy-band diagram. The Fermi level lies near the middle of the band gap, and with very precise control might be made to line up with the pinned value of the metal Fermi level at the semiconductor surface. In principle, these junctions should behave like normal Schottky diodes, turning on with a voltage that pushes the semiconductor majority carriers toward the junction. In practice, the resistivity of the semiconductor will be so high that all you are likely to see is leakage currents.
For a junction on a highly ionic (wide gap) material, where the electron affinity rule actually works, the situation is the same, except that the Schottky barrier depends on the metal work function, and has to be taken into account. But here the equilibrium carrier concentration is so low in the neutral case that you probably won't have a carrier in any reasonable device volume.
A very interesting case is InAs, whose bands lie so low in energy that the conduction band edge is a bit below the Fermi level of metal contacts made to it. The neutral junction condition thus requires degenerate n-type doping, and there is no energy barrier at all. Since any reasonable carrier concentration in InAs is degenerate (because the effective mass is very low) putting just about any metal on n-type InAs gives an excellent Ohmic contact.
- Bill Frensley
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- From: olongdomango
- Re: Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- References:
- Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- From: olongdomango
- Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- Prev by Date: Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- Next by Date: strained si cmos
- Previous by thread: Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- Next by thread: Re: Is a 'neutral' metal-semiconductor junction possible?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|