Re: LED harlots soil their dirty little panties.

In article <3hbu63pkivsraoof6plvtevg1m5fnamnac@xxxxxxx>,
Victor Roberts <xxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:41:01 GMT, Clive Mitchell
<bigclive1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ooh yes! See the filthy little LED tarts make a mess of their photonic
panties with narrow wavelength secretions.

This list is STILL being hammered by porno-spam! Are you sure we
shouldn't have a select mailing list? Or is it really going to pass as
it has before.

A closed list would probably exclude a lot of people who
lurk here below the radar. We could try a moderated group
if people think the spam and porn and are out of hand. But,
based on the relatively small amount of junk we are getting
now, I would prefer to just ignore it as we have in the
past.

I agree. The S/N ratio is high enough to keep the group open, I think.
Moderated, fine, but then someone has to do the moderation...

--
Dr. Hans-Christian Becker
'96 VN750 SM5TLH KG6POK
Uppsala, Sweden
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: LED harlots soil their dirty little panties.
    ... panties with narrow wavelength secretions. ... This list is STILL being hammered by porno-spam! ... or use e-mail address listed at the Web site. ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)
  • Re: LED harlots soil their dirty little panties.
    ... Victor Roberts wrote: ... This list is STILL being hammered by porno-spam! ... I moderated group has the advantage that anyone can still ... or use e-mail address listed at the Web site. ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)